Petrohawk says the 2008 Land Grab is over!
I was at a lunchen today with a speech given by a VP from Petrohawk. It was an infomative talk about the HA. He did say that the Hawk and CHK are partnering up on some wells, and are trying to work together instead of creating competion in the leasing game.
Views: 456
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on
-
Hello, Phyllis. I am not sufficiently familiar with the status of the shale in E. TX. to answer your question. The most knowledgeable member in that area who I am aware of is jffree1.
-
Permalink Reply by Mike Hughes on
-
or a class action anti-trust suit? Could be expensive.
-
Permalink Reply by Granpa on -
KB
I need to ask you a question. I talked to the Landman we delt with on our lease, Acadian Land, we have a great lease, $25,000/ac & 25% royalties,Bossier Parish Sec25 T16N R11W. Our minerals expire Aug 9,2010. They have the majority of the section leased and not all of the section is leased. I asked him about forced pooling and he flat out told me Louisiana does not have forced pooling only Texas & Oklahoma. Now from what i have been reading on this website contradict what he said about Louisiana Can you enlighten me. thanks
-
Permalink Reply by Granpa on
-
His comment to me was that Louisiana did not have forced pooling. I just found that comment kind of strange.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
Granpa,
If he told you this during the leasing stage, I can only assume it was to make you believe you would be left out if you didn't sign.
I have a great deal of respect for some landmen, but most that were involved in the leasing frenzy would have thrown their grandmother under a bus if it would get the lease signed.
-
Permalink Reply by Granpa on
-
He told me this last week when I called him to ask how things were going with the other property in our section. There were several property owners they were trying to sign and one in particular they did not get, That is when i asked him about forced pooling
We signed with them mid Aug of this year and recieved a generous bonus.
The landman said that Petrohawk had a lot of activity in permitting around us but was not at liberty to say much more.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
Granpa,
Acadian leased 122.87 acres from 4 owners and then Assigned to Anadarko. Anadarko assigned to XTO.
Was your lease directly to PetroHawk (handled through Acadian Land?
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
It looks like Petrohawk is the most aggressive, so hopefully they leased the bulk of your section.
The 122 acres was easy to account for, Acadian didn't lease very much under their company name.
The landman may have told you that LA doesn't have force pooling since this may be the line he is presently feeding the unleased in your section. I have seen that when they out and out lie they sort of stick to the same story with everyone. -
-
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on
-
Are you wanting to know what the odds are that you will have prescription interupted?
-
Permalink Reply by Granpa on
-
What do you think the odds are. He seemed to think it would be a photo finish on Petrohwak drilling and the minerals expiring. We have money set aside to drill down to areas we reserved that would interrupt the perscription.
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Bienville Parish, LA
243 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
399 members
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
8 members
-
Rusk County
97 members
-
Vernon Parish
59 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
