Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
"SS, typically 7" casing for the vertical is sufficient to handle the top-drive unit." Les Bamburg replied Jan 20, 2009 to Report From a Strategic Planning Group	29	Jan 25, 2009 Reply by sesport
"Sesport, for an example of two rigs check the following well: Trinidad #122 Rig, Pe…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 20, 2009 to Report From a Strategic Planning Group	29	Jan 25, 2009 Reply by sesport
"Intrepid, the Eagle Ford Shale has a much lower overall potential than the Haynesvil…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 20, 2009 to Report From a Strategic Planning Group	29	Jan 25, 2009 Reply by sesport
"Sesport, Petrohawk has been using "spudder" rigs for the vertical sections of many (…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 20, 2009 to Report From a Strategic Planning Group	29	Jan 25, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Graysands, BP originally had an LNG Terminal for the Galveston Bay area but it was d…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 20, 2009 to Exxon buying out Chesapeake?	59	Jan 21, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
"KB, the 8 wells per section was likely based on "normal" size frac jobs and 80 acre…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 20, 2009 to The Economics of the Longer Laterals	70	Jul 16, 2011 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "Sesport, thanks for posting the presentation. I should have mentioned Qatar Petroleu…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 20, 2009 to Exxon buying out Chesapeake?	59	Jan 21, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Sesport, both the Sabine Pass Terminal in Louisiana and Freeport Terminal in Texas h…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 19, 2009 to Exxon buying out Chesapeake?	59	Jan 21, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "KB, the only reason I did not include Saudi Aramco and Kuwait Oil was because I am n…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 19, 2009 to Exxon buying out Chesapeake?	59	Jan 21, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Parker, great post again. The 200 HS drilling permits is close my count as I show a…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 19, 2009 to 200 HS drilling permits? Article in the Shreveport Times.	5	Jan 20, 2009 Reply by Dion Warr, CPL

‹ Previous
1
…
320
321
322
323
324
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.