DIVISION ORDER LETTERS ??
People around me have been getting division order letters but me and others have not. THe division orders are from petrahawk. So it would seem they all sighned with Petrahawk. The rest of us sighned with CHK and they are the ones who drilled our well. Will the people who sighned with CHK get a division order also?????
Views: 7200
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Keith J Free on -
Hmmm Ok, thanks for the information Larry.
-
Permalink Reply by RJ on
-
Larry,You made more progress then I did by phone. That somewhat helps to know they may have made another unit out of 30 and 31. So when we get the 30 division orders with luck the two will add up to the total land we leased. As far as the unit size. This 31 says 639 acres.Others who live across the street who are with petrohawk unit is 632. So there is a diffrence in units. That should be ok. I did find out about the subordination papers. IF you have already done one as I have, you can use it and send them a copy. I did leave a message with the Land dept about the 30 vs 31 Division order.Maybe they will call me back.
-
Permalink Reply by Larry L on
-
As I stated earlier, I don't think the lease I signed with CHK allows them to make a unit of sections 30 and 31, but is limited to 640 a. It could be that they were only looking at the PetroHawk leases when they decided to unitize it? ?
Anybody out there with a PetroHawk lease for sec 30 or 31 that could answer that question?
Is there an acreage stipulation in your lease, if so what is it?
Thanks.
-
Permalink Reply by Sonja T. on
-
did your original papers have the word subordination listed? Mine did not so I dont know if the orignal one will work. Also, I noticed on the subordination papers they sent this time the dates on the last page had 2008 listed for the mortgage company and chesapeake to sign and have notarized . I have called three times to the Division order number but havent got an explanation yet.
-
Permalink Reply by Katie McCullin on -
Hi Sonja - I work for Chesapeake and would be happy to help put you in touch with someone. If you can message me with your contact information, I'll see that you receive a phone call. Thanks!
-
Permalink Reply by Sonja T. on
-
I tried to message you, but it said I had to send you a friend request, so I did. I just signed up today.
-
-
Hmm,Well guess we will wait for their answer on this from CHK. Did not see this coming. Wow whats next. Just hope the numbers add up to what our lease says as far as the amount of land goes. Interesting to see what they show us in section 30. Not sure about the advantage or dissadvantage in being in 2 sections. Will see what the mail brings.
-
-
Bottom line is that we must preserve the integrity of the written lease! Even if it appears to be advantageous to do one or the other...we need to go with "it is written"!
-
-
Agree 100%. Waiting for answer from CHK. Anyone out there feel free to jump in here.
-
-
Got the other DO today marked for Section 30.
When I add up the two separate acreages contained in the two separate DOs it is over 2% SHORT.
Still waiting on CHK to respond
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
