I saw on the news last night that Entergy had withdrawn their request to get permits for building two additioal nuclear energy plants at Port Gibson, MS and St. Francisville, LA which have to be on the Miss. river for cooling. The news clip said that they would be looking at alternative sources of fuel. Seems to me the logical solution would be natural gas since the supply would be so available and beneficial to the entire region. But then again what do I know.

Views: 18

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Herman, additional nuclear power plants will have to built in the future to address climate change issues because they have no CO2 emissions. Natural gas fueled power plants will be required also to replace coal plants and "firm" renewable power.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service