Community Perspective
Gas line slides to the back burner
Shale gas finds reconfirm need for export line
Larry Wood, Community Perspective

Published Sunday, May 31, 2009

Alaska has just been relegated to the back burner where any natural gas pipeline to the Lower 48 is concerned. Gov. Sarah Palin’s administration and its predecessors bet the bank on a 4.5 billion cubic-foot-per-day pipeline that will never be built. The Alaska Gasline Inducement Act is now a dead end.

What happened?

Two hundred trillion cubic feet of natural gas in shale deposits now being developed in northern Louisiana. The Haynesville shale deposit has been known for many years. Some estimates put the potential reserves at 1,600 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. This formation is not unique.

The Barnett shale in Texas and many other such formations that run throughout the continental U.S. may hold as much as 2,200 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. This is enough natural gas to fuel the U.S. demand for at least 100 years — much longer if the upper-end estimates for the Haynesville shale prove to be anywhere close.

As with any of man’s endeavors, technology keeps improving, and what was impossible a few years ago is now possible. This is the situation with the shale formations. The drilling companies previously lacked the technology to exploit these deposits.

With the potential of these shale formation now in hand, the United States is awash in natural gas. The potential for this gas coming into production is very real, something that did not play into the planning of the big-diameter pipelines our governors seem to favor. The technology and strategies used today were not in place when Gov. Tony Knowles first proposed his Alaska Highway route into the Lower 48 states.

AGIA is now relegated to the dustbin of history by virtue of the magnitude of the shale formation potential physically located within the U.S. market. The Palin administration must see this and move forward to develop the only market available to it: sthe world — more particularly, Asia, and, preferably, Japan and Taiwan.

The maximum amount of natural gas that can be moved off the North Slope and allow oil production to continue is about 2 billion cubic feet per day. This is because 2.5 billion cubic feet per day is required to keep the oil fields pressurized to maintain production.

Alaska must now focus on getting the 2 billion cubic feet of natural gas to market.

What Gov. Palin must realize is that she had it right during the 2006 race. An all-Alaska pipeline of 1.5 billion cubic feet to 2 billion cubic feet capacity must be built from the North Slope to Valdez using the existing trans-Alaska pipeline right of way. I understand that the permits are already largely in place to build the project.

Within five years this pipeline could be moving gas to markets in Asia and elsewhere.

Keeping the all-Alaska natural gas pipeline at a level of 1.5 billion cubic feet of gas per day would give the required 500 million cubic feet of natural gas for a bullet line from Glennallen to Enstar’s hub at Palmer. Fairbanks would receive natural gas from the main pipeline running down the oil pipeline right of way, just as was proposed during the 2006 campaign.

How does the state finance the project? The precedent is already there in the manner in which the Alaska Railroad is run. The Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority is in place and ready to move forward. Use the Permanent Fund to provide collateral for necessary bonding.

Selling the natural gas in the world market would allow us to get the highest price. The Russians have shown that they are unreliable; therefore, there is opportunity. The customer could benefit from a consistent and dependable supply.

Providing for a regulatory environment that would encourage oil and gas exploration would ensure that Alaska would have adequate in-state development of these resources and an ever-expanding ability to use these resources to the maximum benefit of Alaskans.

It is going to take a leader to make such a shift in paradigm.

The choice is the governor’s. She can either rewrite the paradigm, or her administration can continue to flounder. Or, she can decide to change the paradigm and move this state to a place that those of us who backed her thought we were headed, until AGIA.

Larry Wood of Palmer, a 56-year resident of Alaska, is general manager of Terra Resources Ltd., working in the field of soil remediation and oilfield services in Canada.


Buck

Views: 17

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Very interesting.
If Alaska can export NG to the world market, why can't Louisiana do that too ? The port is in place in N.O., isn't it?
LP, the Kenai Plant in Alaska went into service in 1969 and is fairly small by today's standards (~ 200 MMcfd). At the time of development it was the only market available for the Cook Inlet gas reserves.

Currently there are no LNG supply plants in service in the Lower 48. Such plants cost ~ $10 billion in investment and the cost of supplying LNG to world markets from the US would likely be uncompetitive with other potential supplies.

Because the US currently imports ~ 8 Bcfd of natural gas, there are plenty of opportunities to grow supply our own US market.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service