Tags:
I have been following this for a few similarly situated groups and It has been a long story (more than can be explained in a paragraph or two) on the State's claim and then attempts to "study" the river and amend their claims. I'm not sure of all the issues in your particular area, but on the issue of the effect of pooling from the Lock and Dam system, the State has made it clear that they understand their initial claims were off (wide) in many areas and did not account for the effect of pooling and inundation caused by the lock and dam system which created an artificial low water line. However they cannot seem to agree on a proper low water mark line pre-inundation. Some operators have attempted to get out in front on the issue (HK) and at least have made attempts at drawing out different boundaries in order to place a portion in conflict.
I assume this is all leading into to numerous concursus proceedings if the State does not address and amend their claims.
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com