Matthew Murray #21
-Jack Blake wants to keep up with this well and hopes others who have interest in or knowlege of will post.
-Today Jack learned that the well was flowed back within the past couple weeks and there was a big flare burning. Yeah!!!!
Jack passed by the well today and talked to some hands whjo were going to replace the wellhead. They said the well had been chemically plugged and was in the process of being pressure testing to 17000#. The hand who told Jack this really did not know jack s--- about the well as he told Jack the well had not been fraced yet (frac was a month or so ago and then coil tubing drilled the plugs out). Jack wonders if this 17000# was a c orrect test pressure for a chemical plug what does Les B think? What do other subject matter experts think?
Jack Blake signing off----ov er and out...under and in
-Jack saw two brand new stock tanks and a brand new gas seperator skid installed at the well site today. (stock tanks installed permanently?????? Perhaps matthew Murray #21 is not dry gas.....condensate sales??? oh yeah!!
-Jack saw a wind direction sock and a rack of breathing air bottles on the site h2s???
-Jack saw that they have done siesmic all around the area within the last coulpe weeks today, by the filled bore holes. Jack was gonna call CGG Veritas(sp) because he had seen no check, but check was in mail when Jack went by post office today.
-Jack spoke to Centerpoint today and they will be laying P/L close to this well in 2 weeks. Jack was not told, but jack thinks this well will flow into that P/L.
-Jack heard of a section in Sabine that has two wells permitted for one section... Could this be???
What was initial production rate, choke size, flowing pressure of well?
-Today Jack learned that the well was flowed back within the past couple weeks and there was a big flare burning. Yeah!!!!
Jack passed by the well today and talked to some hands whjo were going to replace the wellhead. They said the well had been chemically plugged and was in the process of being pressure testing to 17000#. The hand who told Jack this really did not know jack s--- about the well as he told Jack the well had not been fraced yet (frac was a month or so ago and then coil tubing drilled the plugs out). Jack wonders if this 17000# was a c orrect test pressure for a chemical plug what does Les B think? What do other subject matter experts think?
Jack Blake signing off----ov er and out...under and in
-Jack saw two brand new stock tanks and a brand new gas seperator skid installed at the well site today. (stock tanks installed permanently?????? Perhaps matthew Murray #21 is not dry gas.....condensate sales??? oh yeah!!
-Jack saw a wind direction sock and a rack of breathing air bottles on the site h2s???
-Jack saw that they have done siesmic all around the area within the last coulpe weeks today, by the filled bore holes. Jack was gonna call CGG Veritas(sp) because he had seen no check, but check was in mail when Jack went by post office today.
-Jack spoke to Centerpoint today and they will be laying P/L close to this well in 2 weeks. Jack was not told, but jack thinks this well will flow into that P/L.
-Jack heard of a section in Sabine that has two wells permitted for one section... Could this be???
What was initial production rate, choke size, flowing pressure of well?
Views: 23
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Jack Blake on
-
What was then IP rate from this well???
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
Jack, I am not familiar with a chemical plug but it must be some type of temporary casing plug. This would be required so they could remove and replace the wellhead. A test pressure of 17000 psi seems reasonable to provide plenty of safety margin as the formation pressure there would be > 12000 psi.
Every Haynesville Shale well location has a least two stock tanks (1 - water, 1- condensate) even if the well produces less than 1 Bbl/Day of condensate - just standard practice.
I would expect all well locations in the southern area of the Haynesville Shale play to have the breathing bottles since the H2S content is likely > 4 ppm.
Sounds like the well should be on production in a few weeks and Jack can start counting his money. Unfortunately there still has not been any test data for this well.
-
Permalink Reply by Jack Blake on
-
Thanks Les B,
Jack is ready to start counting the $.
Jack is looking forward to hearing the test data. Jack heard the flare was big while they flowed it back/tested it.
-
Permalink Reply by Jack Blake on
-
Jack just read on SONRIS they did 13 stages! wahoooo! This is an excellent indicator that this will be a kick as* well!!!
PERF 13,546-17,302' (13 STGS)
Now Jack Blake would like to see what the IP rate was.
Matthew Murray #21 section 21 t10n r11w
-
Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on
-
What do you guess Jack?
-
Permalink Reply by Jack Blake on
-
Jack guesses 7.5mmcf/d to 12.5 mmcf/d, but hopes for 22.5 mmcf/d.
I mean 13 stages, it's gotta be good!
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
