Ranking information from SONRIS.
SHREVEPORT ONSHORE 2008
Rank Field Id Field Name Natural Gas Casinghead Gas Gas Total
1 3608 ELM GROVE 103,865,297 1,441,118 105,306,415
2 9203 VERNON 53 828,586 0 53,828,586
3 2360 CASPIANA 39,695,498 871,423 40,566,921
4 8358 SLIGO 27,972,966 154 27,973,120
5 8891 TERRYVILLE 22,301,334 0 22,301,334
ANY GUESSES FOR WHAT FIELD WILL RANK #1 FOR 2009?
Rank Field Id Field Name Natural Gas Casinghead Gas Gas Total
1 3608 ELM GROVE 103,865,297 1,441,118 105,306,415
2 9203 VERNON 53 828,586 0 53,828,586
3 2360 CASPIANA 39,695,498 871,423 40,566,921
4 8358 SLIGO 27,972,966 154 27,973,120
5 8891 TERRYVILLE 22,301,334 0 22,301,334
ANY GUESSES FOR WHAT FIELD WILL RANK #1 FOR 2009?
Views: 33
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
Sorry, the site will not let me format it for easier reading.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
Jay,
Do you think it will be ranked #1 at the end of 2009? Or do you think that one of the fields in Red River will garner that spot? (I realize this is overall production, not just production from HS).
-
Permalink Reply by Snake Stewart on
-
Without a doubt the newly formed Doyline/Dorcheated field.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
Snake,
I thought that field was known as Elm Grove East
-
-
It was, prior to the realization of its own sheer immensity.
It is fairly obvious, by the comments of a couple of representatives from this area, how much gaseous substance is actually contained in said area. It truely boggles the mind.
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
Parker, it is difficult to say because the HS underlies so many different fields. Petrohawk's focus on Elm Grove will likely keep it in the lead but Caspiana has an outside shot. I suggested to the state that they should follow the Texas lead and assign a single field name for all the Haynesville Shale production.
A better question might be which parish will have the lead at the end of 2009.
-
-
Hello Les,
What would that do to leasing tactics if everything in the Haynesville was designated as such ?
Until all boundaries are located how would they be able to accomplish this ? I guess they could just continue to update the area map.I agree wholeheartedly with you on the field designation but from an operators stand point, I can see where they wouldnt want to touch that with a ten foot pole. There is too much aura & mystique associated with Caspiana, Elm Grove, Bethany Longstreet and the likes for the O&G's to have to try and explain away the fact that its all the same thing now. Landmans nightmare if you ask me. Not that I would be totally against spookin a few of those guys a time or two just for kicks. (LOL) Just kidin guys and gals.
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
SS, it is very easy for production reporting. The O&G company already has to identify the zone for gas production. The single field name just allows for easier aggregation of the volumes to better track the growth in production. The same thing was done in Texas for the Austin Chalk (Giddings Field) and Barnett Shale (East Newark Field). The original field names would still be utilized for all non-Haynesville Shale production.
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
