Traders and Investors Pile into Natural Gas ETF
by: Tim Iacono June 16, 2009

Driven by the seemingly perpetual optimism that the price of natural gas can't go any lower when nearly every other commodity price is soaring, traders and investors alike have piled into the giant United States Natural Gas Fund, LP ETF (NYSEArca:UNG) in recent months, a development that has become, ironically, a bit problematic.

The first-of-its-kind ETF that holds only natural gas futures, launched just over two years ago now with average daily trading volume of over 22 million shares and boasting net assets of anywhere between $2.2 billion and $4.5 billion, depending upon where you look, seems about ready to run up against its limit in issuing shares.

This sets up all sorts of interesting possibilities.

Unlike commodity ETNs (exchange traded notes) that simply track futures markets using credit instruments, commodity ETFs (exchange trade funds) normally buy and hold futures contracts for the underlying commodity which, not only has an impact on the futures market itself, but has the added complexity of running up against real limits, self-imposed or otherwise.

This report in the Wall Street Journal has all the details:


One of the hottest investments on Wall Street may have gotten too big for its own good.

With investors betting on rising gas prices, assets in U.S. Natural Gas Fund recently swelled to almost $3.7 billion from about $670 million in February, even sparking fears it could be disrupting the futures market.

Now the popular exchange-traded fund is days away from another potential problem: Funds that hold commodities typically face stiff restrictions on the number of shares they can issue to meet investor demand, and U.S. Natural Gas is running out fast. Securities and Exchange Commission filings show managers want to increase the number of shares available nearly tenfold. But such requests can take weeks and there isn't any telling when the SEC will act.

If the fund can't issue enough shares to meet investor demand, its shares could begin trading at prices higher than the underlying value of their holdings, breaking a key promise ETFs make to investors and possibly influencing prices in the natural-gas futures markets.

This should be interesting to watch - both the response from the SEC and the futures market. Natural gas is unique in the energy commodities group, not only underperforming crude oil and distilled products lately, but doing so by a wide margin as shown below.

Views: 18

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Those are very cool articles. Could I just suggest that you include a link to the originals? I can select text and Google but it's really nice to just click.
The UNG and USO gas/oil are only useful for short term trading. Because of the way futures contracts and/or storage costs work, UNG/USO will lose value vs. the underlying commodity pretty rapidly.

i.e. you don't want to buy and hold these funds.

For instance look at the UNG fund vs. Natural Gas prices:

http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?ung:$natgas

or USO vs. Crude oil.

http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?uso:$wtic

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service