Is there anyway to compare these two wells? Or would it be to indepth?

Discussion at our office, which one is producing better,,,,we are not in agreement.

COMPLETED 8-18-11; GAS; HAYNESVILLE RA; 7784 MCFD; 14/64 CHOKE; 158 BWD; 7690# FP; 85# CP; PERFS 12,525-17,034' MD  Well # 242358

COMPLETED 1-17-11; GAS; HAYNESVILLE RA; 14,064 MCFD; 22/64 CHOKE; 647 BWD; 7330# FP; 3060# CP; PERFS 12,300-14,951' MD Well #239994

Views: 436

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Smith, it is a toss-up but I like the second one by a nose since it's flowing pressure is not much lower even though the flow rate and choke size are larger. 

Smith,
Based on the IP rate of each well and the percentage of choke, rather than size in inches. And the flowing pressures being so near equal, it was not figured in. Here is what each well would have produced on the other wells choke.


Well #1, Actual IP : 7784 MCFD; 14/64 choke. Estimated IP on 22/64 choke of well #2:  ~12,237 MCFD
Well #2, Actual IP: 14,064 MCFD; 22/64 choke. Estimated IP on 14/64 choke of well #1: ~8968 MCFD

FX, the realtionship is not linear and you have to take the flowing pressure in account when comparing the well flows.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service