Empresa Energy Proposed Unit Plat

Views: 2938

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

They are Encap backed, impressive track record IMHO...

from Encap's website: "Empresa Energy I / Empresa Energy II
Empresa Energy is a Houston-based independent oil and gas company focused on the acquisition and development of resource play-type assets. While partnered with EnCap, the Empresa team has successfully developed and realized assets in the Haynesville and Eagle Ford shale plays.  

Empresa I – EnCap and the Empresa management team formed Empresa in December 2004. The company pursued an aggressive growth strategy, amassing a substantial acreage position in the ArkLaTex Basin and Haynesville Shale play. Empresa successfully executed a development program over a four and a half year period, creating significant proved reserve value and resource potential. In July 2009, Empresa sold to Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE: CHK).

Empresa II – Subsequent to the sale of Empresa I to Chesapeake, EnCap again partnered with management to form Empresa II in July 2009. Over the ensuing year, Empresa II deployed its equity commitment in the condensate window of the emerging Eagle Ford Shale play. In June 2010, Empresa II’s Eagle Ford assets were acquired by Chesapeake Energy Corporation.

EnCap is currently partnered with Empresa management in Empresa III, which was formed in September 2010."

http://www.empresaenergy.com/Activeprojects.htm

BLO, thamk you for the info.  Do you think this is a JV with SWN?

Encap , ergo Empressa, has plenty of money. JVs would only be possible if a major player decided to go into development mode becuase of economic returns.

There are 15-20 companies involved at varying stages in this play now, both public and private. It is still nascent, but the size of the players evaluating it could result in an explosion of activity if a good well, or wells, comes in.

I asked because my family's lease was with SWN and we are in the units.

Good morning all,

Is this in Taylor Town or Taylorville

Taylorville is the field. It is in north Union Parish, northeast of the town of Spearsville. It is only about a section and a half from the Arkansas state line. Taylorville is a small "community" in that area on LA Hwy 3121 between Spearsville and Lockhart. There are two Taylortown's in LA - the other is just south of Bossier City in Bossier Parish.  I do not find a Taylorville field on the current DNR GIS map, but the maps provided by Sarah above are definitely in Union Parish.  Taylorville could be a new field designation....or an error.

Correction.... I should have said, "Taylortown is a small community in that area on LA Hwy 3121 between Spearsville and Lockhart. Thus, the two "Taylortown's".

The Office of Conservation has the following operational history on Empresa Energy LP.  18 total well permits none drilled all expired.

E159

EMPRESA ENERGY, LP

 

Well Serial

Well Name

Status

Sec-Town-Rng

Parish

231687

CV RA SUQ;WAITES 21

03

021-16N-09W

07

232540

CV RA SU78;SOUR EST 13

03

013-16N-11W

08

232614

CV RA SUS;GLASS ETAL 29

03

029-16N-09W

07

233754

CV RA SUY;T K GIDDENS ETAL 30

03

030-16N-09W

07

234304

CV RA SU109;GALLASPY 10

03

010-15N-14W

16

234316

SUSTAINABLE FOREST 26

03

026-15N-10W

07

234317

SUSTAINABLE FOREST 35

03

035-15N-10W

07

237201

MURRAY ETAL 37

03

037-14N-10W

41

238512

CV RB SUWW;GOLSON 37

03

037-14N-10W

41

238513

HOSS RB SUWW;GOLSON 37

03

037-14N-10W

41

238561

CV RB SUQ;SUSTAINABLE FOREST26

03

026-15N-10W

07

238579

HOSS RB SUQ;SUST FOREST 26

03

026-15N-10W

07

238789

CV RB SUT;SUSTAINABLE FOREST 4

03

004-14N-09W

41

238798

CV RB SU71;SUST FOREST 33

03

033-15N-10W

07

238966

HOSS RB SU71;SUST FOREST 33

03

033-15N-10W

07

238969

HOSS RB SUT;SUST FOREST 4

03

004-14N-09W

41

238982

SUSTAINABLE FOREST 35

03

035-15N-10W

07

973647

SUSTAINABLE FOREST 11 SWD

03

011-14N-10W

41

A client who knows Empresa Energy suggested that I review HOSS/CV wells in the same sections where the company formed Haynesville Units and sold to CHK.  The data shows that Empresa drilled a number of successful Hosston and Cotton Valley vertical wells in some of those sections and a good many of the expired permits listed above were in force when the buyout occurred.  I did not find any evidence that the company has horizontal completion experience in LA. 

IMO the formation of L SMK  units accomplishes two things;  it alerts other operators that Empresa has Brown Dense prospective acreage available for development and, in the event they find no takers, it enables a singe well, including a vertical completion, to hold all the leases encompassed in the unit boundaries.

I think most of Empresa's  interest in NW La was bought by Chesapeake in 09.

Empesa may have had Working Interest in some other operator's wells or some leasehold.  The 17 well permits, not counting the SWD, cover a period from July, 2005 to October, 2008.  They drilled no wells as an operator and there is no drilling or production data prior to or after those dates.

http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellorg6?...

Skip, What do you think is going on here? It seems Empressa is a non-operator. Do you think they are looking for a partner or acting on behalf of some other company?

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service