CHESAPEAKE APPLIES TO TAKE OVER HA UNITS FROM XTO
CHK has applied to the Commissioner to replace XTO as operator of the following HA units in the Converse Field: HA RA SU77 - Section 21 - 9N -13W, HA RA SU83 - Section 15 - 9N -13W and HA RA SU84 - Section 22 - 9N - 13W,
http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch_070611/UCMRedir.aspx?url=ht...
Views: 891
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by J B Nabors on -
IMO, that is unfortunate.
Chesapeake is my "least favored" operator. They have been to court many many times for actions unfavorable to mineral owners. Examples: for failing to honor a "No Cost" clause in a lease, and for selling production to a subsidiary at below market prices. We have a well that is partly owned by Plains--and Chesapeake consistently pays significantly less per MCF than Plains for the same time period. -
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of) nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.
This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Bienville Parish, LA
246 members
-
North Caddo Parish
359 members
-
Cass County, TX
121 members
-
Nacogdoches County
193 members
-
Claiborne Parish
146 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Rapides Parish
101 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
150 members
-
Harrison County
166 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
9 members
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
