Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on June 18, 2010 at 16:07

List Them Please!!!

Permalink Reply by grasshopper on June 18, 2010 at 16:32

These were listed on SONRIS:

241541 HA RA SUJ; Whitney CORP 17H, 020-10N-13W Petrohawk 15 June 10 BENSON
241554 HA RA SUJJ; RH EVANS 4H, 004-09N-14W PETROHAWK 18 June 10 CONVERSE
241556 HA RA SUWW; Wright Family 24 013-09N-13W PETROHAWK 18 June 10 CONVERSE
241557 HA RA SUZZ; WRIGHT FAMILY 13H 024-09N-13W PETROHAWK 18 June 10 CONVERSE
241562 HA RA SUDD; HOUGH ETAL 30H 031-09N-12W PETROHAWK 18 June 10 BAYOU SAN MIGUEL

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on June 18, 2010 at 18:09

GH, it is interesting to note that at least three of the wells are located outside Petrohawk's "core" area.

Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on June 19, 2010 at 1:34

Petrohawk and Cheasapeake will be busy in Sabine all year...be interesting to see if Comstock will keep their current number of rigs. They are not pressed on HBP like others. I'm thinking they will. These fringe areas can produce!

Permalink Reply by Martin on June 19, 2010 at 10:45

Could it be that, say T9 and T8, for R12, 13, and points west may be a transition region where both the Haynesville shale and the Bossier shale are economically productive?

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on June 19, 2010 at 11:01

Martin, we already know some of the area is productive for the Bossier Shale and accoring to EnCana's map it may be productive for the Haynesville Shale also.