Does anyone know what happend to this well. Looks as though it was a relatively long lateral and the IP was 998 Mcfd on 21/64ths. Any help on this would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Views: 11

Replies to This Discussion

I saw a press release (can't find it now) that this well was to have IP'd at 14300 Mcfd and then I saw the reported IP and was interested in the difference. Just trying to keep things straight. Thanks.
Jay: Here is an excerpt from a Goodrich Press Release 5/18/09:

"The company has also completed two additional Haynesville Shale wells in the Bethany-Longstreet field of Caddo and DeSoto Parishes, La. The Chesapeake Energy - Branch 2H-1 tested at a rate of 14.3 MMcf per day on an 18/64 inch choke with 6,750 psi, and the Chesapeake Energy - ROTC 1H-1 tested at a rate of 14.1 MMcf per day on an 18/64 inch choke with 7,150 psi. The company owns a 50% working interest in both wells."

SONRIS Reported IP's:
Branch #2H-1 998 MCFD
ROTC #1H-1 8159 MCFD

Both wells in 14-16. FYI.
Thanks for your help. I had seen this. I am going to keep checking SONRIS due to the differences reported. Have a good day.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of)  nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.

This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service