Does anyone know what happend to this well. Looks as though it was a relatively long lateral and the IP was 998 Mcfd on 21/64ths. Any help on this would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Views: 11

Replies to This Discussion

I saw a press release (can't find it now) that this well was to have IP'd at 14300 Mcfd and then I saw the reported IP and was interested in the difference. Just trying to keep things straight. Thanks.
Jay: Here is an excerpt from a Goodrich Press Release 5/18/09:

"The company has also completed two additional Haynesville Shale wells in the Bethany-Longstreet field of Caddo and DeSoto Parishes, La. The Chesapeake Energy - Branch 2H-1 tested at a rate of 14.3 MMcf per day on an 18/64 inch choke with 6,750 psi, and the Chesapeake Energy - ROTC 1H-1 tested at a rate of 14.1 MMcf per day on an 18/64 inch choke with 7,150 psi. The company owns a 50% working interest in both wells."

SONRIS Reported IP's:
Branch #2H-1 998 MCFD
ROTC #1H-1 8159 MCFD

Both wells in 14-16. FYI.
Thanks for your help. I had seen this. I am going to keep checking SONRIS due to the differences reported. Have a good day.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments

Not a member? Get our email.



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service