455 members
440 members
600 members
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Comment Wall (7 comments)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Hope this helps
Sent 1 hour ago
DoubleEagle's property in located in T14N-R15W-Sec3 (Caspiana Field). I am unable to locate a producing well in that section. I did find 4 wells in neighboring sections. One well (238641) is located in section 2, another well (238639) is located in section 11, another (238645) in section 1, and the fourth (238180) in sec 36 of T15N-R15W. The fourth well was permitted to the Smackover formation on 8-4-08, and is designated as a disposal well. The other three wells were permitted to the HS formation, but no production records have been released. If you look at the applications listed on the DNR website (application date = Aug 26, 2008 / Application number 08-1230), you will see in the plot that is attached to the application that section 3 (Double Eagle's section) is marked for unitization (HA RA SUF). I am unable to locate a unitization request for section 3, but since it is already marked, it is a matter of time before the request is made. Anyway, from the four neighboring wells, I can not locate any production records for any of the well. I am only able to locate the drilling applications, and each one is permitted as a "non-unitized" well. it seems the operator is withholding the production records as long as allowed by law. Personally, I see that as a positive thing. Until Chesapeake unitizes all of the intended section, the chances of gathering the production records may be difficult. I hope this general information helps resolves some of DoubleEagle's concerns.
Even tho the wells have been drilled it doesnt mean that they are online yet so the info may not show up on Sonris. I do have some brilliant friends that have an inside track that may be able to find out some info for you tho.