Joel 19N, 15W, S33's Page
Profile Information
📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Visit the Forum and click "Follow" after the last discussion.
Visit the Forum and click "Follow" after the last discussion.
Top Content
Groups
-
North LA Cotton Valley C…
68 members
-
Shelby County, TX
478 members
-
Nacogdoches County
194 members
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
11 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
405 members
-
WESTERN HAYNESVILLE
18 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
250 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
457 members
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
11 members
-
San Augustine, TX
388 members
Blog Posts
Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??
Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
Comment Wall (2 comments)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
landownerBobi Carr ("parker") said…
It sounds like originally that person owned property in both sections. When the assessor's office changed over to their new numbering process (that is in line with Township, Range and then Section), they probably just used the tract that the owner had the most property in.
The assessor's office only has the responsibility to value property for taxes. The landmen that are running title will NOT rely on the assessor's records.
landownerBobi Carr ("parker") said…
I read everyones message board. Just nosey.
The sections are as follows:
06 - 05 - 04 - 03 - 02 - 01
07 - 08 - 09 - 10 - 11 - 12
18 - 17 - 16 - 15 - 14 - 13
19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24
30 - 29 - 28 - 27 - 26 - 25
31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36
I believe it was done originally because this was the most practical way to survey the sections. No GPS back then.
Parker