Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 4, 2010 at 12:53

RBH, the Bowers #1 was completed as a vertical and the Lane #1H, I believe, has not been drilled.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 12, 2010 at 15:59

Laurie, it looks like they are still drilling on the Lane #2. Baker Hughes still shows a rig on it on todays report.

Permalink Reply by RBH on February 25, 2010 at 11:18

LANE #2:
Per Chuck Wheeler #1 is Petrohawk. Well #2 will not produce concurrently as the #1. -02/18/2010 02:36:17 PM

TENAHA, SOUTH (COTTON VALLEY)
TENAHA (JURASSIC)
TENAHA, SW. (TRAVIS PEAK)
TENAHA(GLEN ROSE)
DAVSUN (PALUXY)
WILDCAT

PETROHAWK OPERATING COMPANY : LANE GAS UNIT #1h
Casing Status
2/15/2010 Intent To Plug Unknown

landownerPermalink Reply by shelbyco on February 25, 2010 at 10:56

RRC records show that the Amended Permit was approved on 2-23.

landownerPermalink Reply by Laurie on March 4, 2010 at 18:18

Any news lately? Rig still there?? I think they were supposed to move over and try again, any word around on that?

Permalink Reply by RBH on March 5, 2010 at 14:19

3-5-2010-still listed in Baker Hugs Rig report as drilling

landownerPermalink Reply by shelbyco on March 19, 2010 at 9:24

This well is no longer on the Baker Hughes drilling report.

landownerPermalink Reply by Laurie on April 1, 2010 at 17:04

Anybody know what that means? I thought I understood that a new well would be put next to this one. Does anyone have any information about this area and what if any activity is going on???? Thanks!

landownerPermalink Reply by LJW on May 26, 2010 at 11:09

Anyone ever hear what the results of this well were?

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on May 26, 2010 at 11:15

Laurie... the rig never left. They permitted a sidetrack from the original hole and just kept drilling. After the sidetrack was finished the rig left.

LJW... no, nothing yet.

landownerPermalink Reply by LJW on May 26, 2010 at 11:31

Thanks. Keep me posted if you hear anything. Just curious, are you from Tenaha?

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on May 26, 2010 at 13:11

Nope, south end of Sabine County.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next ›
• Page