PRICE WEAKNESS 2011, LESSONS LEARNED AND WHEN TO STAY AND WHEN TO GET OUT

Shale gas supply expected to keep US prices low in 2011

Dec 3, 2010

Bob Tippee
OGJ Editor

HOUSTON, Dec. 3 -- While another year of price distress awaits US producers of natural gas from shale reservoirs, technology has lowered breakeven thresholds of important plays, speakers said at an industry conference in Houston.

Beyond next year, said Dan Pickering, copresident of Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. LLC, $4/Mcf gas is unsustainable. In the long term, he explained, a commodity’s price must cover the highest cost in the most  xpensive 25-30% of supply needed to meet demand. For that part of the projected supply spectrum in 2013, Pickering said, the breakeven price with a 10% before-income-tax rate of return ranges from just less than $6/Mcf to slightly more than $8/Mcf.

Pickering told the Decision Strategies Oilfield Breakfast Forum that current price weakness results
from a supply jump rooted in surprisingly high levels of drilling and drilling efficiency since 2009.

Despite low gas prices, drilling stayed high in 2010 because of lease obligations, protection of
producers against price weakness by hedges, and a surge in the formation of joint ventures with drilling commitments.

Those factors will begin to subside in 2011, Pickering said. For example, less production
will be hedged, so “industry will be much more exposed to gas prices in 2011” and therefore more inclined to reduce drilling if prices stay low.


Meanwhile, the electric power generation market will have to absorb a gas surplus that Pickering estimates at 1.5 bcfd in 2011, meaning gas prices will have to stay low enough to displace coal.

“This is the driving relationship for 2011,” he said, voicing a “muted expectation” of an average gas price of $4-5/Mcf for the year.

“We have to watch the rig count,” he said. “A rig count at current levels [means] too much gas for the indefinite future.”

Lowered breakeven prices


Amerino Gatti, vice-president of Schlumberger’s Reservoir Production Group, said technological progress has lowered the gas price at which shale-gas investments become economic to $5/Mcf in many basins and to $4/Mcf in the Marcellus and Fayetteville plays.

Gatti said increased fracture intensity has improved production efficiency in most plays but
added, “The industry is still working to strike the right balance between stages, productivity, and economics.”

A Schlumberger analysis of production logs from more than 150 wells in the Woodford,
Barnett, Fayetteville, Haynesville, Eagle Ford, and Marcellus shales confirms the variability of reservoirs and production patterns.

“Production is not uniform in horizontal shale gas reservoirs,” Gatti said. About 30% of the perforation clusters in the wells studied contributed no production. Results vary by region.

Petrohawk’s experience


Richard K. Stoneburner, president and chief operating officer of Petrohawk Energy Corp., cited lessons his company has learned as it exits some unconventional gas plays to focus on the Haynesville and Eagle Ford shales.

“Geology matters, and the earlier you know, the better,” Stoneburner said. “If you get the geology right, get the planning and the capital commitment right.”

Then, he said, “get the engineering commitment right” by optimizing fracture stimulation and production practice.

In the Haynesville play, Petrohawk has raised estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) to a projected 10 bcf/well from an average 7.5 bcf/well through reservoir optimization, including restricted flow rates and improved frac designs.

Rate restriction, Stoneburner said, addresses concerns about embedment and proppant  deformation. The practice has reduced first-year production decline by about 50%, stabilized base
proved-developed-producing decline, and deferred the need to install fieldwide compression.

Optimization of frac design increases net present value per well, improves EUR over time through continual modification, and relates stimulation design to geology and regional well performance.

Calling the past 2 years “truly historic,” Stoneburner said the industry has discovered the equivalent of 500-1,000 tcf of gas in the Marcellus, Haynesville, and Eagle Ford shales. Most of the accomplishment, he said, came from mid-sized independent producers working under requirements of leases that typically have 3-year primary terms.

“When this period of lease capture is complete, companies with positions in the core of these plays will have established a legacy of assets that will provide decades worth of risk-free drilling with the potential to change America’s energy future,” he said.

In addition to focusing on two shale plays, Petrohawk is shifting investment toward liquids-rich prospects in the Eagle Ford play and away from dry-gas prospects in the Haynesville while gas prices remain low, Stoneburner said.

Business and politics


Chris Reinsvold, Decision Strategies chief executive officer, said unconventional resources require a business approach different from conventional plays.

“Learning and operational efficiency are key to business success” in unconventional plays, Reinsvold said.

He said risk mitigation and value maximization plans should incorporate relevant uncertainties and clear decision points.

He described a business approach that allows for exit at critical stages, such as if the resource proves disappointing during exploration, if pilot wells during evaluation show recovery to be deficient, and if pilot tests prove during delineation to have generated “false positives.” Only if the project still appears profitable after passing those decision points should the producer move to development, the
“factory phase” phase of unconventional operations, Reinsvold said.

John D. Jensen, senior-vice president, operations, of El Paso Exploration & Production Co., said the abundance of hydrocarbons from shales will enhance the attractiveness of gas by stabilizing price.

He said an “evolution” in energy policy and physics from “high-carbon, low-tech to low-carbon, high-tech” should open markets for new gas supply.

But he urged industry representatives to help policy-makers understand the potential supply and environmental benefits of gas.

“We’re failing to tell our story as an industry,” Jensen said. “It’s our job to educate people.”

Contact Bob Tippee at bobt@ogjonline.com.



Views: 48

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"Rate restriction, Stoneburner said, addresses concerns about embedment and proppant deformation. The practice has reduced first-year production decline by about 50%, stabilized base proved-developed-producing decline, and deferred the need to install fieldwide compression."

Is this true? I haven't seen numbers to support this. Any idea?
I do not recall this being discussed previously in regard to the 50% reduction but I haven't listened to the last couple of HK webcasts. The increase in EUR average to 10bcf/well is one of the comments that caught my eye. In general there should be incremental improvements in drilling, completions and production for some years to come. We are only a little over two years into actual wide spread development. I think that improved frac designs will lead to an expansion in development in current fringe areas once prices rise and become somewhat stable. Our focus here on GHS tends to be chronically short term. I think when we look longer term, we have many reasons to be optimistic.
Under long term reasons to be optimist, I submit the following article with the caveat that the potential problems mentioned in the final paragraph will prove to be overblown concerns and will not pose a long term threat to the rise of nat gas demand.

All hail natural gas.

As VentureBeat reported last week, analysts are forecasting that natural gas will move to beat out solar and wind, even though it’s a fossil fuel and not a renewable resource. It does, however, emit a lot less carbon than coal, and is likely to play a bigger role next year in federal energy policies and green entrepreneurship, according to consulting firm Kachan & Co. And the news about natural gas just keeps coming.

Today, boutique investment bank Cascadia Capital predicted that oil will hit $100 per barrel next year,which will spur oil companies to expand their operations by buying up natural gas assets and companies.

That’s already started to happen. Last month, Chevron acquired natural gas company Atlas Energy for $3.2 billion. And a year ago, Exxon spent $25 billion to buy natural gas producer XTO Energy.

Natural gas expansion looks like part of the Middle East’s efforts to go greener. The United Arab Emirates’ state-run Abu Dhabi Water and Electricity Authority plans to build several 500-megawatt natural gas power plants, but it will also be able to defer the construction thanks to energy efficiency gains promised by the implementation of Hara’s energy efficiency software. (The company announced the multi-year, multimillion-dollar deal today.)

And as we mentioned last week, consulting firm Black & Veatch reports that coal market share will be cut in half in the next 25 years because companies will retire coal-fired equipment rather than face the cost of complying with pending air quality regulations in 2015 and beyond. (Black & Veatch’s projections are pictured below.) The ebbing tide of coal will be made up for by the doubling in natural gas, which is expected to rise from 21 percent of U.S. energy use in 2011 to 40 percent in 2035. And a recent Ernst & Young report found that low natural gas prices in the U.S. have made it tougher for solar and wind projects to win financing.

The good thing about natural gas is that there’s existing infrastructure for it, and hundreds of years left in the supply. And if some early-stage technology is able to scale up to commercial production, makers of renewable natural gas — that is, synthetic natural gas created from renewable feedstocks — could pose a big threat to solar and wind companies, according to Dallas Kachan, managing partner at Kachan & Co.

One hiccup in the rise of natural gas, though, could be environmental concerns. The problem with natural gas, as Black & Veatch points out, is that the hydraulic fracturing process of harvesting the natural gas has caused issues at the massive Marcellus Shale site in the northeast U.S. There have also been issues with the handling of wastewater and fluids used in the fracturing process — leading Pennsylvania authorities to fine natural gas companies and shut down some of the wells.
Timing and location is everything. I'm lucky to have reached agreement on leases for everything in April of this year. Three years with no option. I'll be happy if they secure all the units with production and bleed it into the system slow because of the low prices. It would be a pleasure to lease again once the price runs up if they don't hold some by production. I found the best position I could after missing out on the boom money.

Long term potential for my family long after I am gone is what it looks like. It will be what it is. Gas is in the face of tree huggers now. We don't trap people in the bottom of these holes to mine gas either.

CNG stations are coming to your neighborhood if the east coast gets off the fracking pressure point with the press. We live O&G here. They just don't understand. Lazy Yankees need to go to work!
Great read and thanks for posting it. I think some of the other operators have been implementing restricted flow policies without advertising themselves as doing so. I also wish that there was more of a focus on long term opportunities. That discussion doesn't generate a great buzz and it isn't hysterical enough to sell copies of The Times but if cultivated correctly it could influence the course that our country chooses when decidinig what to do with all of this gas.
Thanks Skip! There is a lot to be optimistic about for the long term.

I'm always stunned to recall that just a few years ago people were talking about a shortage of NG and the need to import LNG. The shale plays have changed that and could change our energy and economic future.

I appreciate having a front row seat to watch the development of what I think could be the solution to many of our nation's energy and economic problems. It's great to have GHS to keep up with it.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the next year. I have interest in a unit (unleased) that has about 220 acres under lease that expires in July 2011. The lease was purchased for $8500/acre by Petrohawk. I think they have an option to renew for 2 years at about $4000/acre. Their choice will be to let it go losing about $2 million, extend for 2 years at about $880,000 or get more leases and drill. They already have good production close by and pipeline access.
Financial constraints will cause some companies to forgo renewals even where they think the shale is productive. Petrohawk has announced that they will have HBP'ed all their Haynesville leasehold by the second quarter of 2011. In your case losing $2M may be the preferred option to the much greater amount that would be required to lease the remainder of the unit acres and drill a well. Some companies may let leases expire and then come back later with reduced lease offers. It's triage on a wide scale and each instance is unique.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service