Replies to This Discussion

landownerPermalink Reply by Checkmateking on September 18, 2009 at 3:18

excellent

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 18, 2009 at 3:32

Electro. I haven't reviewed north Caddo lately. Are there additional wells where the Longwood and Caddo Pine Island fields meet that are still WOC after all these months?

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 18, 2009 at 3:55

Skip, waiting on test results for the Lanier well and Petrohawk to drill the lateral for the Gary well.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 18, 2009 at 3:59

Thanks, Les. I was thinking there were more but I seem to remember that there were some permitted wells that never spudded and the permits expired.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 18, 2009 at 5:58

Electro. I had to look up Status Code 31. I do not recall seeing it used before. It is "Shut-In Dry Hole - Future Utility".

landownerPermalink Reply by Coonman on September 18, 2009 at 4:03

Where is this well in refence to Sec 17 R19 T16

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 18, 2009 at 4:14

The Bohnert well is in Section 28 of 19N - 15W so it is ~ six miles to your east and ~ two miles further south.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 18, 2009 at 3:52

Skip, I think the press release had a typo and this should be the Bohnert 28 #H1 Well.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 18, 2009 at 3:57

You are correct Les.

landownerPermalink Reply by Neilson Jacobs on December 3, 2009 at 5:42

My notes indicate that the IP reported on SONRIS was 3165 Mcf. Did I get it wrong? If it was 7.5 MMcf how is that explained in light of results in other wells in the area?

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 3, 2009 at 6:03

Nope, Neilson. You are correct as to the IP reported on the SONRIS Well Scout. This discussion and the IP it reports did not come from SONRIS. Or from Chesapeake for that matter. The very first announcement (see discussion title) came from Goodrich which has a working interest in the Bohnert well. Goodrich was having serious financial difficulties prior to the discovery of the HS and has taken every opportunity to trumpet and spin the prospective nature of their HA rights in order to raise capital. It is not unusual for an operator to run a number of tests upon the completion of a well. The test Goodrich relied on in their news release may just be different from the one CHK reported to the state.