JHH's Discussions (1,066)

View

Discussions Replied To (830)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "You're correct. But i'm still hopeful facts will outweigh the bad judgements/action…" JHH replied Dec 7, 2012 to UT Officials Resign in Wake of Fracking Study Controversy	10	Dec 9, 2012 Reply by JHH
landowner "Yes. " JHH replied Dec 6, 2012 to US LNG exports create net economic benefits: DOE study	11	Dec 7, 2012 Reply by cocodrie man
landowner "Agreed! Our air is so much cleaner... we're getting more sunburn! Dang... just can'…" JHH replied Dec 6, 2012 to US LNG exports create net economic benefits: DOE study	11	Dec 7, 2012 Reply by cocodrie man
landowner "I'm sorry to be so negative. But i don't believe one thing from a bureaucrat or a p…" JHH replied Dec 6, 2012 to US LNG exports create net economic benefits: DOE study	11	Dec 7, 2012 Reply by cocodrie man
landowner "It was an encouraging report... but there's a lot of political/environmental opposit…" JHH replied Dec 5, 2012 to US LNG exports create net economic benefits: DOE study	11	Dec 7, 2012 Reply by cocodrie man
landowner "No. I would think between $200-$500 per rod plus damages. Also, read the agreement…" JHH replied Nov 24, 2012 to pipeline	19	Dec 8, 2012 Reply by KIM CASWELL
landowner "That would be plus trees. The $400/rod might be high... might be low. Ask around t…" JHH replied Nov 6, 2012 to OneOK pipeline graced me with their presence.	28	Nov 16, 2012 Reply by chuck calvert
landowner "sorry... here's the last. Texas Forestry Service http://txforestservice.tamu.edu/ma…" JHH replied Nov 6, 2012 to OneOK pipeline graced me with their presence.	28	Nov 16, 2012 Reply by chuck calvert
landowner "Here's the Hunt County Ag Extension Office web site. I know... they changed their n…" JHH replied Nov 6, 2012 to OneOK pipeline graced me with their presence.	28	Nov 16, 2012 Reply by chuck calvert
landowner "$200/rod seems very low. It doesn't hurt to ask for more... but i'm not sure how muc…" JHH replied Nov 6, 2012 to OneOK pipeline graced me with their presence.	28	Nov 16, 2012 Reply by chuck calvert

‹ Previous
1
…
31
32
33
34
35
…
83
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.