Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by John Avatar on November 24, 2009 at 5:53

The Buckner is a shale lying immediately above the Smackover.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bacon on November 25, 2009 at 0:47

"You may do a search on the site and find it."

My search got nothing. Do you have a link by any chance? Thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on November 24, 2009 at 17:38

John, my recollection was the Buckner is a sandstone that is productive in certain regions of the LaMiss Salt Basin.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on November 24, 2009 at 18:16

Who needs the "oil" purported under the shale when they keep finding more "lagniappe" gas?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Avatar on November 25, 2009 at 4:19

http://www.bobcatresources.net/Stratigraphic%20Column-East%20TX%20B...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Terry L. Antee on November 25, 2009 at 4:43

The Buckner in some places is a shale (Red River Co. Texas) in other places I have seen Buckner sands in the shale, in most of Louisiana and Ark. the Buckner is an Anhydrite and can have either sand or limes in it, but this is not normal.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Avatar on November 25, 2009 at 4:53

The Buckner in N Louisiana and S arkansas is a red shale with anhydrite stringers. The Buckner is the upper seal for the Smackover/Norphlet with the Luann salt being the bottom seal.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on November 25, 2009 at 9:16

Les,

Do I assume correctly that the Buckner will be similar to the Cotton Valley and only be present in traps and not consistent like the Haynesville?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bacon on November 25, 2009 at 9:33

"pretty good" was as specific as he got concerning the production. Anyone know what well he might be talking about? Thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by S.H.M. on December 1, 2009 at 3:39

Great chart!

• ▶ Reply