Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 1, 2015 at 16:38

I don't think such a clause would be acceptable to the vast majority of energy companies.  I have seen clauses prohibiting assignment to any company associated with a particular individual but that was a rare, localized situation.  Although a mineral owner is free to ask for whatever they wish, in this case I don't think such a clause should be a priority.  The chance of these particular leases being assigned to Chesapeake would be extraordinarily slim in my opinion.  It would take a very large mineral interest in a hot play for any decent size operator to consider such a prohibition. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by rodney e. fortenberry III on February 3, 2015 at 5:23

Counter with  1/4 royalty see what happens but don't know if this is a good offer for your area. It could be due to down prices.

r

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page