Several larger landowners have recently filed new lawsuits against Chesapeake for underpayment of royalties. Chesapeake continues to underpay royalties to all of its royalty owners by $1.00 to $1.50 per/mcf, as compared to Petrohawk, Exco, etc. For all of us smaller landowners who don't have enough acreage to afford attorneys, somehow the Justice Department needs to get involved to investigate Chesapeake's accounting practices when dealing with pricing and deductions!!! They are stealing $$$$ from ALL of its royalty owners!!!! Everyone needs to somehow get mad and involved!!! IF you have check stubs that show how Chesapeake is underpaying you and/or not abiding by the lease clauses in your lease, please send letters to newspapers, legislators, TV stations, etc and show how you are getting screwed!!
Tags:
I totally agree with you, W. R.
We have used a "red ink stamp" that says the same thing on division orders as yours since the early 1980's. They come back and complain about the stamp, but pay us anyway. The checks are good for several months to a year or so, then taper off as the wells are expected to deplete in volume produced. That's when the oil companies get greedy.
They pull all kind of crap - Change (lower) the interest decimal you are being paid on, change of operator every 2 years or so, reflect a lower amount of NG produced from the well(s) you're being paid on as it differs from the Sonris site, they never pay on plant products your expected to get your share of, they change in accounting practices/software as reflected on your check statements, etc. So, they create an accounting nightmare which is very difficult to trace. Most people, they expect, will just be happy to get a check.
There are a few in the Haynesville Shale who are on to those like CHK ripping people from their just share of the minerals. But most people don't even realize the magnitude of theft.
CHK does indeed need more cash for restructuring in the wake of McClendon's tenure of the company. The need is in the billions, not millions. That translates to a lot of landowners to screw over.
I have a friend in DeSoto Parish who feels that she could be paid on an incorrect decimal interest or being paid wrong. She and relatives have a smaller acreage as discussed above. To whom could she communicate or is there someone who could give her some suggestions or assistance? What actions should she take? Is there a La. attorney that she could contact on a free basis for one session or one letter?Thanks!
Marg,
Anyone who believes a company is miscalculating their interest should notify that company in writing of the problem. In order to get a company to make any changes to your ownership decimal, you will need to provide sufficient evidence from the title history to demonstrate not only that their decimal is wrong, but also what the correct decimal is. You will likely need a landman first, and maybe an attorney later.
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com