Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by DJG on July 13, 2010 at 11:17

... and here's the original W-1 info:

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/DP/drillDownQueryAction.do?fromPubli...

and location plat:

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/dpimages/r/774082

2.8 miles SW of Chireno

J.A Chireno survey (A-17)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on July 13, 2010 at 22:32

Looks like a 16 stage frac to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on July 14, 2010 at 3:01

SB, you are correct about 16 stages plus the test rate was the average for 3 days. I just can't determine if the well is complated in the Bossier Shale or Haynesville Shale.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DJG on July 14, 2010 at 4:52

Les, were you able to check out the info on the G-1 report?

If I am reading that info properly, it looks like this well was an Haynesville completion.

Elevation: 313'
Top of Pay: 14,640'
TD: 14,351'
MD w/Lateral: 19'560

Formation Tops listed:

Saratoga: 4,250'
Eagleford: 5,580'
Paluxy: 6,180'
Mooringsport: 7,040'
Base Massive Anhy: 7.955'
James Lime: 8,480'
Pettet: 8,775'
Travis Peak: 9,445'
Cotton Valley "B" Lime: 12,168'
Bossier: 13,100'
Haynesville: 14,100'

So it looks from the report that this particular horizontal is coming from the HA formation.

Interesting to see, however, that there looks to be 1,000' of thickness in the BO above that HA depth. That would seem to be some extra positive news I would imagine?

Also it will be interesting to see how many of those shallower formations end up playing out as productive.

There is history in the region with prior production from at least 7 of these formations. Doesn't mean that there will definately be productive pay zones at all of those depths at this particular site, but wouldn't too surprised to see many of them pay out.

Attachments:

• Crane1H-G1.pdf, 28 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on July 14, 2010 at 9:41

DG, the Bossier Shale is ~ 1000 ft across most of the play but the productive "Mid-Bossier" Shale is only a portion of the Bossier Shale. From the inclination report the well looks like a Mid-Bossier Shale producer but it is not that clear.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DJG on July 14, 2010 at 10:12

Thanks Les, appreciate the info and insights...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James L. Williams on July 15, 2010 at 7:42

I have a question for D. Gaar: How do you access the G-1 and G-5 reports from the RRC website? I'm interested in the Walters gas unit (API 405-30331) that just went on line this week.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DJG on July 15, 2010 at 8:20

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/CMPL/publicHomeAction.do

Use the link above and click on "completions query".

Then put in the appropriate information that you are searching for.

I have been just searching by "District 6" and then looking to see what new reports have come in.

I didn't see the Walters unit yet reported, however, and it can take a few months from after the actual test date until the report ends up getting filed and listed at TRRC.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James L. Williams on July 15, 2010 at 12:50

Thanks. I tried and was able to get the reports for the Crane well. The Walters unit just started to flow this week, so I'm sure you are correct that it will be a while before the reports are filed. From what I've heard the Walters unit IP is about like the Burrows and King units.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DJG on July 13, 2010 at 11:45

By the way, EOG already has well #2 in this unit spud:

Nabors #409 Rig, EOG, Crane Et Al #2H Well, Serial #696900 , Nacogdoches County

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on July 13, 2010 at 22:33

DG, is the Crane et al #2 east or west of the Crane #1? Will you provide the W-1 info for the Crane #2H ? This is big, big, big!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by adubu on July 14, 2010 at 0:28

springBranch--this info (W-1)should be on drill permit rrc site also plat and P-12 list

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 5
• Next ›
• Page