New methodology revises 2009 output down, and January 2010 output down, which in turn........had no positive effect whatsoever on the price of gas. The current weeks injection was the only data point that meant anything to traders.  I know this new method of accounting for production has been discussed here before but now that the results are in I am curious to hear your thoughts and opinions.



Later Thursday, the EIA said production of natural gas in February rose 1.6% from January's output, which it revised lower.

Using a new methodology this month, the EIA revised its January 2010 estimates downward by 0.6 billion cubic feet per day for the
continental U.S. The agency revised lower its 2009 output estimates for
the lower 48 states as well, ranging from -0.3% at the beginning of the
year to -1.3% at year-end, the EIA said.

Views: 14

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"The current weeks injection was the only data point that meant anything to traders."

sums it up i think. the silver lining is i like where we stopped the bleeding, much below 4 and i'd be worried.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of)  nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.

This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service