Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bacon on March 11, 2009 at 1:19

Not to get OT here but, it would be great if you could see more than 10 threads per page once you get in a category. I find it incredibly annoying to have to click through five pages when it it could all be on one. Having 40 pt. thread titles is totally unnecessary. Otherwise, fabulous job!

FYI, this site fits 100 threads per page. Makes it very easy to scan a ton of them quickly.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Catfish on March 11, 2009 at 1:20

old way please

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by intrepid on March 11, 2009 at 3:02

Hey, Bacon....large thread titles helps those of us with older eyes. :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bacon on March 11, 2009 at 4:38

Hey, I gots old eyes too. If you can read the 12pt. type that your seeing right now you can read a 16pt. headline. The image didn't post at 100% (at least not for me). It was just illustrating that you can have 20 threads + your banner ads in an organized and easily readable layout (you scroll down for the other 80). Just a LOT of wasted space in the current setup. My .02¢ and stepping down. Carry on! One more thing... the site could be a lot snappier speed wise if it wasn't loading so many images. Now I'm done.. really.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Donald L Ashberry on March 11, 2009 at 4:00

Keith, I go to this site for only one reason... to see what's happening with topics related to "the shale". I recognize that others may want to talk politics and what's happening "elsewhere", but the further you can keep these discussions from me, the better I'll feel about it. "Thank you" for all you do for us!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sue on March 11, 2009 at 4:41

Keith,
I like the old way. I try not to get caught at work looking at your site. It takes me to long the new way. LOL
Sue

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce on March 11, 2009 at 13:15

I like the old format better, it was easier to read and keep up with current discussions. To be honest, with the new format I just click off the site.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Aubrey C. Sanders, Jr. on March 11, 2009 at 16:50

Keith:

At this moment I prefer old format but will report in again after trying new one a while.

aubrey

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by pal on March 11, 2009 at 17:55

I like the old format.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Iris on March 12, 2009 at 1:07

I have older eyes but I can enlarge my own screen if I need to read better. I liked the idea of knowing what's hot & current in topics, If one of your monitor volunteers could steer political discussions to their proper place -- that would be great too. For right now I guess I'll vote for the old way. Maybe you could lighten up so many images....that' s my penny thought. Thank you so much for this site, it has been immeasurably helpful!

P.S. I think Bacon's illustration of the thread count is a bit too small.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on March 12, 2009 at 10:17

Keith,
I like the way you have it right now.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page