SECTION 30 TWN 17 RGE 15 ???? GREENWOOD DRILLING??
Have been trying to find out if any drilling or plans on drilling in SEC 30 TWN 17 RGE 15. Have seen the 31 and 32 plans and those owners also got letters indication drilling. As of now I know of no one getting a letter indicating plans on Drilling in this area. Anyone with any info on this area would be appreciated.
Views: 130
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
RJ, Chesapeake has permitted the Tucker 32 #H1 Well (Ser #240406) in your section.
-
Permalink Reply by RJ on
-
Wow that was fast. Did it say where it was going to be? I thought 3-4000ft was as far as they could drill Horz. Where can I find this info Les.
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
RJ, please ignore my previous post as I made a mistake with the section number. There is not a permitted Haynesville Shale well in your section and the section has not been unitized.
Please accept my apology for the mistake.
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
JA, only Section 32 in T17N-R15W has a permitted Haynesville Shale well.
-
-
I was wondering why it said 32. Curious why there seems to be Sections around 30 being permited and drilled but no section 30. I think even 31 may have a permit. When you say its not been unitized what does that mean Les. Hey dont worry about the mistake you are correct many many times more than you are wrong. No need for an apology Les. Appreciate you trying to find out. Im sure lots of folks in section 30 would like to at least see a permit for 30 soon.
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
RJ, actually only Section 32 is the only one in T17N-R15W with a permitted Haynesville Shale well. There are two Haynesville Shale wells permitted to the south in Sections 5 & 6 of T16N-R15W.
Not being unitized just means no one has applied with the State to form a Haynesville Unit for Section 30. Normally this occurs before applying for a well permit. Eleven sections (2-7, 9-10, 15-16, 32) in T17N-R15W have Haynesville Units.
-
Permalink Reply by J. A. on -
Who has permitted section 16 and any related info as we have land in section 16, 17 and 20
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
JA, Samson is the operator for the Haynesville Unit in Section 16.
-
-
Hmm,Well that is not good news for section 30 then. Wonder what the problem is if any with 30. Maybe there is a PAD location problem or something. You would think that They would want their lease money back for that section. Maybe they are just doing the easy to get to locations right now. Will the unit application also be on Sonris ?
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
RJ, the timing for well permits and drilling is primarily related to lease expirations. If the acreage is already held by production or if the leases are not set for expiration in the next few months then there is no strong reason to drill immediately. It is also unclear who controls the majority of the acreage in Section 30.
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
