Mr. Baker owns a tract of land, where title was quieted by a judgment which clearly states that he owns the surface and minerals, subject to a prior reservation of one-half (½) of all oil, gas and minerals.

Mr. Baker sells the tract to Mr. Green, reserving one-half (½) of all minerals without notice of the prior reservation.

Question: Did Mr. Baker sell ½ of ½ (1/4) of all minerals to Mr. Green or did Mr. Baker, through his failure to notice the prior reservation, forfeit his entire one-half (½) interest to Mr. Green? This is Texas land and Mr. Baker’s heirs wish to sell their mineral interest in this tract. Do they own ¼ of the minerals or not?

Views: 169

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

That's why I asked... I have read some of the Peavy decision.
Thanks, adubu. Someone else told me the same thing (e-mail).
Thank you. That is the way I understood it (but I am no expert) since it was a Warranty Deed under consideration.

adubu, see the attached article (copied without reference to where found) by Mike Howard: Interpreting Mineral Reservations: The Duhig Rule
Attachments:
Sounds reasonable.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments

Not a member? Get our email.



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service