Clements Heirs Well and Adjoining Well. The Truth!! maybe!
Clements Heirs Well and Adjoining Well. The Truth!!Below please find a post by scout.
Reply by scout on May 3, 2009 at 8:28pm
Tom, what do you know about ETOCO well in T23 R14 S20? Serial #238870 (producing 353 bpd?). Isn't this close to the Cements Heirs well? Also isn't this oil and a big producer. Did I read this wrong? tia
I answered his question saying the Clements well had stated Perforating and Completing in the Haynesville. Both wells were drilled to approx 11,800'.
Guess what ? They were both tested for the Haynesville, and I have had some good reports of the well flareing very good and the well making a impressive noise when it was first tested. About 4 or 5 months later the well came in weak. Now a well very close and the well mentioned above which is a Dominock Well is supposed to have IP of over 350 BOPD. At first I was a little confused because the Haynesville isn't supposed to have oil, then I remembered the possibility of the Shale transition to Sand Formation.
He is my take on both these wells.
They were drilled to the Haynesville and tested.
They were plugged and brought back up to approx 9,700' and produced in the Cotton Valley.
This information is public information, but what they found at the bottom hole depth isn't. They paid for it and they aren't producing it at that depth. Now if they didn't find something on the Clements at 11,800' in the Haynesville why bother to go to the expense to drill that deep again?
With the cost of drilling and the price of gas it may be some time before we know what is down that deep this far north, but someday we will.
Reply by scout on May 3, 2009 at 8:28pm
Tom, what do you know about ETOCO well in T23 R14 S20? Serial #238870 (producing 353 bpd?). Isn't this close to the Cements Heirs well? Also isn't this oil and a big producer. Did I read this wrong? tia
I answered his question saying the Clements well had stated Perforating and Completing in the Haynesville. Both wells were drilled to approx 11,800'.
Guess what ? They were both tested for the Haynesville, and I have had some good reports of the well flareing very good and the well making a impressive noise when it was first tested. About 4 or 5 months later the well came in weak. Now a well very close and the well mentioned above which is a Dominock Well is supposed to have IP of over 350 BOPD. At first I was a little confused because the Haynesville isn't supposed to have oil, then I remembered the possibility of the Shale transition to Sand Formation.
He is my take on both these wells.
They were drilled to the Haynesville and tested.
They were plugged and brought back up to approx 9,700' and produced in the Cotton Valley.
This information is public information, but what they found at the bottom hole depth isn't. They paid for it and they aren't producing it at that depth. Now if they didn't find something on the Clements at 11,800' in the Haynesville why bother to go to the expense to drill that deep again?
With the cost of drilling and the price of gas it may be some time before we know what is down that deep this far north, but someday we will.
Views: 1305
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Bennett on
-
I think I went to McLoad back in 2009 to see the Starcke well. Gate was locked and posted. I'm going from memory but I think they were reentering that well to drill deeper. Is that correct?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Bennett on
-
dbob, I went back and looked at archives and found the following. Starcke # 2 permitted to drill to 13,000 ft. CV was 10128, Smackover 10834 and Wildcat 13,000. Don't know what they found in lower smackover or deeper. This was a well that was reentered.
-
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Franklin County, Texas
9 members
-
Cass County, TX
120 members
-
Rusk County
97 members
-
Livingston Parish, LA
34 members
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
