Can someone give me any insight into this situation. A landowner signs a lease and then later contests the lease in a law suit. The leasing agent flips the contested lease to a big player, company X,  before final litigation. Company X approaches the landowner to contract for a surface site agreement for a well pad. Landowner finds out Company X may not bedrilling the well on the proposed well site, appears company X will flip site to Company Z, which allows company Z to use surface site to drill into & produce from an adjoining section. Is this the norm? Any insight will be appreciated.

Views: 9

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of)  nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.

This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service