I did not do either but I recieved a letter from the title company stating that I did not sign over mineral rights (their mistake) and they included some paper work they wanted me to sign. I am thinking I do not want to sign them. Any thoughts?
If the paperwork is a correction deed, whereby you meant to retain the minerals, I'd sign. In a heartbeat.
It's amazing how many landowners 'think' they're retaining their minerals (in Texas) by not 'mentioning' them, when conveying land. I've dealt with a lot of unhappy clients when I told them they 'gave away' their minerals with their land (for less than what the minerals alone could be leased for).
If you'd sold to me, I'd be hesitant to return the minerals. In a lot of cases, the minerals are worth more than the land.
Good luck!
If it is a mineral servitude, 10 years in Louisiana unless there is a good faith effort to establish production (drill a well, even if it is a dry hole) will interrupt prescription on minerals and the prescriptive period begins anew.
If it is a mineral servitude, and there is production, the production interrupts the prescriptive period until production ends. Then the prescriptive period runs anew from the date production ends.
If it is a royalty only servitude, only actual production will interrupt prescription.
Best,
Buddy Cotten
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com