Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by richard v. simmons on January 12, 2011 at 13:44

Across from Mr. Larry Steelman on Neel Lane and I think the land belongs to Mr. Ricky Evans. I don't know for sure but Cheasapeake will probably drill 17 and 20 from this pad. They have leases in both and have unitized both. My lease runs out May 6 in section 20 and someone else in section 17 said his lease is up in June. So I say drill baby drill!

Permalink Reply by Dixie on January 12, 2011 at 16:05

Thanks for the info Richard.

Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on April 11, 2011 at 8:47

Section 6 permitted March 15, # 242937...Frank Fox 6...SWEPI

Permalink Reply by Dixie on April 11, 2011 at 23:25

Thanks Ken, I have updated the diagram.

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 12, 2011 at 3:00

Dixie, nice grid.  Just one small correction - the following well is permitted for Section 30 rather than Section 31.

 

Petrohawk, Hough 30 #H1 Well, Serial #241562, S31(30)-T9N-R12W

 

Permalink Reply by Dixie on April 12, 2011 at 10:42

Thank you Les B, I have corrected that error.

Permalink Reply by Dixie on April 19, 2011 at 15:16

Two new wells permitted in T9N-R12W. One in section 25 and one in section 21. this township has only  7 sections with no permitted  HS wells and one section not unitized yet, S33. Things are moving right along.

Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on October 26, 2011 at 6:28

Brumley 8, (243365) now drilling in section 17 to section 8. At least 2 planned for each section. This brought to my attn. by Waltcop. Dixie, not many left out now!

Permalink Reply by Dixie on October 26, 2011 at 15:37

Yes Ken, it looks like things are really moving on for 9N-12W. There is only one section that is not unitized and then only two without permitted wells. Section 3 has 11 permitted wells and Section 9 appears to have 13 permitted wells, if I am looking at this right. Seven of the wells in S9 have surface locations in that section and six of the wells will have the surface location in S16. Please correct me if I am wrong. I have updated the chart to reflect the changes.

Two wells in each section sounds like a good start to me.

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 26, 2011 at 17:09

Dixie, I believe there may be 14 wells in Section 9 including 6 with surface locations in Section 16.

 

EnCana, Jimmy Ray Brown 9 #H1 Well, Serial #240294, S9-T9N-R12W, Sabine Parish, 18375 Mcfd, 23/64" Choke, 8019 psi Flowing Pressure
EnCana, Jimmy Ray Brown 9 #H2A Well, Serial #242912, S9-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Deanna Sistrunk 9 #H3A Well, Serial #242715, S16(9)-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Deanna Sistrunk 9 #H1A Well, Serial #242750, S16(9)-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Deanna Sistrunk 9 #H2A Well, Serial #242751, S16(9)-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Deanna Sistrunk 9 #H4 Well, Serial #243411, S16(9)-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Deanna Sistrunk 9 #H5 Well, Serial #243412, S16(9)-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Deanna Sistrunk 9 #H6 Well, Serial #243413, S16(9)-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Theresa Spears 9 #H1A Well, Serial #242752, S9-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Theresa Spears 9 #H2A Well, Serial #242753, S9-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Theresa Spears 9 #H3A Well, Serial #242754, S9-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Theresa Spears 9 #H4A Well, Serial #243313, S9-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Theresa Spears 9 #H5A Well, Serial #243314, S9-T9N-R12W
EnCana, Theresa Spears 9 #H6A Well, Serial #243315, S9-T9N-R12W

Permalink Reply by Dixie on October 27, 2011 at 23:10

Thank you Les B for the correction, I have added another mark  to include the missed well for S9. 14 wells in one section, wow! Do you know if this is the most wells permitted in any one section for the Haynesville Shale? I am not keeping up with DeSoto Parish and I am guessing there could be more per section there. After all,  DeSoto is the "sweet spot", with so much more activity than any other parish.

Permalink Reply by W P on January 3, 2012 at 5:17

  My relatives have land in S33 9n 12w and I know they are leased by Cheasapeake what is going on with this section 33 it is not unitized yet ? Is there a fault or is the older surface wells in this section like the Wetcher well keeping it from being unitized?

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 13
• 14
• 15
• 16
• Next ›
• Page