Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by DJG on February 7, 2010 at 13:40

Lease Name: CAMPBELL, Lease No: 253311, Well No: 1
District 06
Lease Production and Disposition
Jan 1993 - Jan 2010

Date GW Gas (MCF) Condensate (BBL) Operator Name Operator No. Field Name Field No.
Production Disposition Production Disposition
May 2009 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT BURK ROYALTY CO., LTD. 108799 WILDCAT 00012001
Jun 2009 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Jul 2009 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Aug 2009 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Sep 2009 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Oct 2009 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT UNIT PETROLEUM COMPANY 877099 WILDCAT 00012001
Nov 2009 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Dec 2009 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Jan 2010 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Total 0 0 0 0

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 7, 2010 at 15:05

On the January proration schedule, Campbell #1 was still under Burk Royalty as T.A. but on the Feb. schedule it is under Units name and still T.A. (temporarily abandon) along with the Smith #1 with the same status.
Chesapeake just filed a permit for the Smith #1H on the Burk/Unit-Smith #1 acreage so maybe they will do something with the Campbell #1 as well. Maybe the Burk/Chesapeake dispute is now resolved and these wells will get finished.

Permalink Reply by Marsel in Texas on February 7, 2010 at 16:21

so there is no production going on at this time? We got paperwork from unit for us to get royalty checks. I am new to the oil/gas production stuff. I appreciate all the clarification you can give me.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 7, 2010 at 19:12

Marsel, Unit Petroleum is the record owner of the well at this time and may have completed the well. If they did, it is not reporting any production yet. That is what RBH posted. Did they ask you to sign a division order and send it back to them?

Permalink Reply by Marsel in Texas on February 8, 2010 at 13:14

yes i got a division order on this past friday.

Permalink Reply by adubu on February 8, 2010 at 1:46

jffreel--I understand CHK and Burk settled their lawsuit in Burk favor and CHK is now operator of the leases in question that CHK originally agree to buy from Burk in 2008 in Shelby County when prices drop like a rock and CHK tried to drop the contract and not pay for leases.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 8, 2010 at 9:44

Then, I say that is good news for the folks who are "stuck" in limbo in one of the Burk units!

Permalink Reply by Marsel in Texas on February 7, 2010 at 16:19

I'm sorry I don't understand what No RPT stands for. :( I guess there is no production?

Permalink Reply by adubu on February 8, 2010 at 1:48

no RPT is "No Report" from operator to RRC for that month

Permalink Reply by RBH on February 8, 2010 at 8:43

ALSO CAMPBELL IS NOT SHOWING UP IN THE "PENDING" PRODUCTION REPORT ON THE TRRC WEBSITE

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/PR/publicQueriesMenuSubmitAction.do

Permalink Reply by adubu on February 8, 2010 at 11:41

RBH---you have to be reg with user ID to use this link

Permalink Reply by RBH on February 8, 2010 at 12:41

adubu..woops...sorry...the pending production is not something you have to be registered to use on the Texas Railroad Commission website...do not know why it gave that link...
http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/data/online/index.php

then the production reports query\(pr)
then pick one--see the "pending"--found that some wells do not move out of this for a while

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page