Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 29, 2010 at 13:36

It's in the Benjamin J. Porter Survey, A-559 on FM 1645.  If you will look on the attached photo, it is the balloon with 19.623 next to it.

Attachments:

• Oliver #4.jpg, 181 KB

Permalink Reply by cicero on December 29, 2010 at 14:42

Thanks Jffree.  Do you agree with the posting in "strictly shale" that this well is producing a very large amount of natural gas?

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 29, 2010 at 17:39

Yes, it's a pretty good well.  I haven't looked at the production on it lately though so I have to go with what is posted until I look.

landownerPermalink Reply by little ole 1st grade teacher on December 31, 2010 at 6:42

What towns or communities are near this well?

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 31, 2010 at 16:07

teacher it's NE of Martinsville.

landownerPermalink Reply by DJG on December 31, 2010 at 15:00

The well is still currently the head of the class for all producing in Shelby County.

 

First turned to sales in Sept 2008 and has since produced just shy of 6.8 BCF with reports through October 2011.   Peak month was Oct 2008 where it produced over 740,000 mcf for an average just shy of 25 mmcfd.    Pretty strong numbers for a vertical completion.

Lease Name: OLIVER UNIT , Lease No.: 243122 , Well No.: 4 Well Type: Gas County Name: SHELBY District: 06 Lease Production and Disposition Date Range: Jan 1993 - Dec 2010

31 results Page: 1 of 1 Date GW Gas (MCF) Condensate (BBL) Operator Name Operator No. Field Name Field No. Production Disposition Production Disposition Jun 2008 0 0 0 0 DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION CO, L.P. 216378 STOCKMAN (COTTON VALLEY) 86233300 Jul 2008 0 0 0 0         Aug 2008 0 0 0 0         Sep 2008 159,432 159,432 0 0         Oct 2008 695,887 695,887 0 0         Nov 2008 740,409 740,409 0 0         Dec 2008 702,675 702,675 0 0         Jan 2009 563,964 563,964 0 0         Feb 2009 441,166 441,166 0 0         Mar 2009 439,401 439,401 0 0         Apr 2009 356,190 356,190 0 0         May 2009 315,320 315,320 0 0         Jun 2009 298,311 298,311 0 0         Jul 2009 241,758 241,758 0 0         Aug 2009 238,294 238,294 0 0         Sep 2009 216,212 216,212 0 0         Oct 2009 201,665 201,665 0 0         Nov 2009 160,653 160,653 0 0         Dec 2009 137,698 137,698 0 0         Jan 2010 130,327 130,327 0 0         Feb 2010 80,857 80,857 0 0         Mar 2010 93,895 93,895 0 0         Apr 2010 85,172 85,172 0 0         May 2010 83,435 83,435 0 0         Jun 2010 76,942 76,942 0 0         Jul 2010 75,678 75,678 0 0         Aug 2010 72,407 72,407 0 0         Sep 2010 66,076 66,076 0 0         Oct 2010 63,071 63,071 0 0         Nov 2010 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT         Dec 2010 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT         Total 6,736,895 6,736,895 0 0

landownerPermalink Reply by DJG on December 31, 2010 at 16:45

<p>The formation records on both of them are showing the Pay Zone at approximately 12,000 to 12,100' deepth.   They list do list shallower formations such as Pettet, James Lime, Travis Peak etc, but then only list Cotton Valley as the last formation logged at around 10,000' deep.   No mention of Haynesville or Bossier so it the exclusion of those formations make it SEEM like the producing zones are in the shallower Cotton Valley B zone.</p> <p> </p>
<p>Comparing them to other more recent completions in that area, however, show that Cotton Valley B is at around 10,000',  Bossier is at around 10,900,  Haynesville at around 11,900 and then Cotton Valley Lime at around 12,050 and below.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>That said, it seems pretty clear that these two wells are producing from the CV Lime below the Haynesville and Bossier.</p>" class="description xj_comment_editor" id="desc_2117179Comment1722051">

Took another look at the completion reports for both that Oliver #4 and the Case #3 wells there in Shelby.

 

The formation records on both of them are showing the Pay Zone at approximately 12,000 to 12,100' deepth.   They list do list shallower formations such as Pettet, James Lime, Travis Peak etc, but then only list Cotton Valley as the last formation logged at around 10,000' deep.   No mention of Haynesville or Bossier so it the exclusion of those formations make it SEEM like the producing zones are in the shallower Cotton Valley B zone.

 

Comparing them to other more recent completions in that area, however, show that Cotton Valley B is at around 10,000',  Bossier is at around 10,900,  Haynesville at around 11,900 and then Cotton Valley Lime at around 12,050 and below.

 

That said, it seems pretty clear that these two wells are producing from the CV Lime below the Haynesville and Bossier.

landownerPermalink Reply by Sarah on January 28, 2011 at 15:45

Thank you DG for taking the time to post this detailed info about the Oliver.  My minerals are just 1/2 a mile away so it's much appreciated.

landownerPermalink Reply by adubu on February 7, 2011 at 1:23

DJG---- This is a Pinnacle Reef well--IMO