Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on August 8, 2010 at 1:05

Is the Haynesville Lime and Smackover the same formations.....am I correct?

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 8, 2010 at 3:03

Ken, the Haynesville Lime is below the Haynesville Shale and above the Smackover formation. Please see the attachment.

Attachments:

• Crimson Pay Zones.pdf, 68 KB

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 8, 2010 at 3:05

AL, my underatnding is the Haynesville Lime would require horizontal wells for development but maybe not multi-stage frac's. Just need to see more development activity.

Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on August 8, 2010 at 3:31

Les, is that not a small window, the Haynesville Lime... would you be looking for gas condensate or just more dry gas? Thanks for the attachment.

Permalink Reply by Jon Williamson on August 8, 2010 at 6:55

I was told by an Endeavor landman that they weren't very interested in the shale at these prices, but did encounter some pay in the Haynesville Lime with the Hall #1. That is what they intend to produce.

Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on August 8, 2010 at 7:13

Jon, I am afraid more operators are feeling that way other than the HBP. The Eagle Ford is starting to mildly pick the Haynesvilles pocket for rigs. Since both Sabines are joined at the hip so to speak this is interesting.

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 8, 2010 at 8:21

Ken, the rig count for the Haynesville Shale has remained steady for the past couple of months. No operators have indicated any plans to reduce the rig count this year.

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 8, 2010 at 8:22

Ken, I believe the Haynesville Lime would be dry gas similar to the Haynesville Shale.

Permalink Reply by ALongview on August 8, 2010 at 9:22

Les, That is what is being produced from the Haynesville Lime in Shelby County.

Permalink Reply by DJG on August 8, 2010 at 10:01

Devon's Oliver #4 well seems to be producing from HA Lime depths. Directional well that is currently the best producer in all of Shelby Co.

Completed in Sept '08 with an IP of 19.6mmcfd. Has produced about 6-1/2 BCF of dry gas in just under 2 years.

Devon also has a permit for a horizontal completion in that same unit that has not yet been drilled. Imagine that they want to get all of their acreage leased and HBP'd prior to testing out a horizontal completion in the formation.

Permalink Reply by DJG on August 8, 2010 at 10:03

Attached is the completion report filed with TRRC for the above well.

Attachments:

• DVN-Oliver Unit #4 Completion Report.pdf, 3.8 MB

Permalink Reply by DJG on August 8, 2010 at 10:21

Production report for that Oliver #4 directional drilled well:

Peak production was in Nov '98 at just about .74 BCF in that month alone = 24.68 mmcfd for that month.


Lease Name: OLIVER UNIT, Lease No: 243122, Well No: 4
County Statewide Onshore
Lease Production and Disposition
Jan 1993 - Aug 2010

View Page By Page

Date GW Gas (MCF) Condensate (BBL) Operator Name Operator No. Field Name Field No.
Production Disposition Production Disposition
Jun 2008 0 0 0 0 DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION CO, L.P. 216378 STOCKMAN (COTTON VALLEY) 86233300
Jul 2008 0 0 0 0
Aug 2008 0 0 0 0
Sep 2008 159,432 159,432 0 0
Oct 2008 695,887 695,887 0 0
Nov 2008 740,409 740,409 0 0
Dec 2008 702,675 702,675 0 0
Jan 2009 563,964 563,964 0 0
Feb 2009 441,166 441,166 0 0
Mar 2009 439,401 439,401 0 0
Apr 2009 356,190 356,190 0 0
May 2009 315,320 315,320 0 0
Jun 2009 298,311 298,311 0 0
Jul 2009 241,758 241,758 0 0
Aug 2009 238,294 238,294 0 0
Sep 2009 216,212 216,212 0 0
Oct 2009 201,665 201,665 0 0
Nov 2009 160,653 160,653 0 0
Dec 2009 137,698 137,698 0 0
Jan 2010 130,327 130,327 0 0
Feb 2010 80,857 80,857 0 0
Mar 2010 91,553 91,553 0 0
Apr 2010 85,172 85,172 0 0
May 2010 83,435 83,435 0 0
Jun 2010 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Jul 2010 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Aug 2010 NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT NO RPT
Total 6,380,379 6,380,379 0 0

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page