Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by North LA on July 13, 2012 at 16:49

Lee,

I was talking about the difference between 301 bopd and 360bopd. Still don't know if the BML well is really at 360bopd but if it is then I wouldn't be thrilled. Time will tell.

Permalink Reply by whodat on July 14, 2012 at 4:13

Mike,

Does your source know any pressures, choke sizes, gas rates, or water rates?? at 360BOPD is pretty good if their flowing on a small choke and still unloading a lot of frac fluid. 

Permalink Reply by North LA on July 14, 2012 at 7:10

I went by the Monroe office of conservation and took a look at the BML well file. I didn't see any specific production numbers but I did see one interesting page. There was a page which appeared to be an engineering diagram showing the frac. Looks like the well was fracked over 40 times and they used different types of plugs in different portions of the well.

I thought this may have been a frac plan for the original horizontal length but on the page it showed a horizontal length equivalent to the current total depth. I thought it was interesting that they fracked the well so many times. I wish I could find out what frac fluid they used. I don't think they've used the porcelain fracs yet but have only been using slick water.  I should of made a copy of the page but I didn't.

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on July 14, 2012 at 11:40

The 40 frac stages would agree with what SONRIS reported, that they had installed a total of 43 isolation packers in the BML, yet Bill Way said at the Global Hunter Conference on June 25 that this well had a total of 19 frac stages. Maybe he was confusing it with the Garrett, but he clearly said 19 frac stages. If the Garrett had been fracked at this frac density, maybe its production would have easily exceeded the target of 500 BOPD initial production.

Permalink Reply by Debra Gray on July 13, 2012 at 13:34

Well now I feel better and I'm LMAO

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on July 13, 2012 at 17:07

Debra,

I had to look up LMAO. I think the news is mildly encouraging, but I don't see anything hilarious about it. Everyone to his own notion though. LOL.

Permalink Reply by North LA on July 14, 2012 at 2:14

Obed,

She was replying to this comment

I heard everbody who owns land in Union Parish is going to get rich..... How's that?  : )   j/k

She wasn't replying to the production numbers.

Everybody seems a little uptight on here lately.

Permalink Reply by John D Cook on July 11, 2012 at 12:05

Skip,  I noticed well allowables we posted on the BML on sonris today.  One was 2974 and other was 3191.  Is this allowables for gas or oil?

Permalink Reply by whodat on July 11, 2012 at 15:18

could someone explain what well allowables mean?

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on July 11, 2012 at 17:40

The allowables are the maximum daily amounts of oil or gas allowed by the state to be produced, but I don't know how the state determines these numbers. They often seem to be about the same as the well potentials, but the state may also regulate the choke size.

Permalink Reply by Jim York on July 12, 2012 at 2:22

What this means is that SWN requested an emergency clearance from the Office of Conservation to sell oil that was produced in the time frame specified

Begin Date 07/01/2012	End Date` 07/09/2012			BBl Oil 3191	days of prod 9	BOPD 355
06/14/2012	06/30/2012			2947	6	491

The emergency clearance does not speak to gas since it was flared and not sold.

Permalink Reply by Big Little Oil on July 12, 2012 at 3:09

Please post the link where you obtained BOPD because the well data page on Sonris does not have anything but obvious oil sales allowables for 15 days(2947) and then allowables for 9 days (3191), which is a puzzling second set of dates. The rising allowables per day makes sense as the load comes back but the fact they cut it off and reported at July 9th does not.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 10
• 11
• 12
• 13
• 14
• …
• 17
• Next ›
• Page