Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on March 27, 2014 at 14:08

Seems to be a long way from the LSBD?

Permalink Reply by landman on March 28, 2014 at 3:55

Maybe they want a different piece of equipment?

Permalink Reply by Golfoil on March 31, 2014 at 11:18

They may be using that rig to do some more drilling of the Fayetteville Shale in Central AR. Probably not Brown Dense

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on October 15, 2014 at 10:26

Looks like the Benson was completed  8/29/2014, as reported by SONRIS Lite 10/13/14. The results look comparable or better than the Sharp well just to the north, so SWN had much better results going south from the Sharp than what they got in the Milstead going north from the Sharp:

COMP 08/29/14: GAS, L SMK RA SUC, 706.41 BOPD, 2132 MCFD, GOR 3.01/1 GOR, CK 12, GVTY 54.2, BS&W 0.3%, FP 4721, CP 2927, PERFS: 9497'-9505', 9620'-9628', 9700'-9708', 9790'-9798'

http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellinfo2...

Permalink Reply by North LA on October 15, 2014 at 15:20

That pressure looks impressive.

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on October 16, 2014 at 6:03

Yes, the flowing pressure is more than twice that reported for the Sharp, the BOPD is 25% better, and the MCFD is 96% more, plus the Benson is on 12/64" choke versus 14/64" for the Sharp. Here are completion results reported  by SONRIS Lite for the Sharp:

COMP 03/21/14: OIL, LSMK RA SUA, 564 BOPD, 1089 MCFD, GOR 1.93/1, CK 14, GVTY 49.8, BWD 30, BS&W .025%, FP 2158, CP 1752, PERFS: 9174'-9668'.

Another plus for the Benson is that it produced no water vs. 30 BWD for the Sharp:

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch/UCMRedir.aspx?url=http%3a%2...

Permalink Reply by Land Rat on October 16, 2014 at 6:57

Any info about the frac job on this one or was it unstimulated?

Permalink Reply by North LA on October 16, 2014 at 7:15

It wasn't fraced.

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on October 20, 2014 at 6:28

It certainly seems that you are right about there being no fracking in the Benson. At least, only perforating (by Baker Wireline) is mentioned in the work resume for the Benson:

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch/UCMRedir.aspx?url=http%3a%2...

For the Sharp, the work resume shows both perforating and 3-stage fracking (by Halliburton):

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch/UCMRedir.aspx?url=http%3a%2...

So the 30 bbl of water produced in the Sharp could be frac water, but even with fracking the Sharp is not as good as the Benson without fracking.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page