Horizontal Smackover
serial number 238493
This is a horizontal smackover in Red River parish. It will be interesting to see what it does.
This is a horizontal smackover in Red River parish. It will be interesting to see what it does.
Views: 179
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on
-
Please post the section, township and range of the Lincoln Parish well you are speaking of. Somehow I must have missed that one. I haven't been aware of a horizontal CV well in Lincoln Parish.
-
Permalink Reply by North LA on
-
I got the information about the CV well from word of mouth so it could be wrong. I couldn't find it either so I'm going to take it off for now.
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
North LA, I suspect the well may actually be a Haynesville Shale test even though it has Smackover on the permit.
EnCana, Black Stone Min 13 #H1 Well, Serial #238493, S13-T13N-R10W
-
Permalink Reply by Checkmateking on
-
No doubt about it, all the early northern Caddo wells were permitted as smackover.
-
Permalink Reply by North LA on
-
Oh well. I guess since they were permitted through the conservation hearing as Jurrasic formation they can call it whatever they want to as long as they are in the JUR formation defined by the DNR.
-
Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on
-
I think you should be referring to serial number 238108. This is the Colbert Well Encana recently completed. Unfortunately, the permit was for the Haynesville Shale and I as understand the engineer made a significant error and went into the "Bossier Shale". As I understand, this is a great well but it will not hold the current lease per the requirements of the permit. As you can see, Encana has already received another permit #239399 to drill another well in the same section, but this time into the Haynesville Shale. As I was told, it they did not do this they would lose the lease on this particular section.
-
Permalink Reply by North LA on
-
No I was refering to the well I mentioned because it had Smackover formation listed on the permit. That's very interesting that they made a mistake and went into the bossier and still had a good well. I wonder If both the bossier and HS are productive would it signinficantly increase all estimates of recoverable gas? I mean if you can get a 20mcf well from the HS then drill back another 100-300 feet above the HS and get a 10mcf well that would be huge.
-
-
Nothing officially has come out, but I understand it is good. There were 10 to 12 zones fracked. Not sure if it is good as the horizontal well in the HS Encana did on the Bundrick land. I understand it tested 60 MCF a day, but they had it choked back to 15 to 20 MCF currently
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
