Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by herefordsnshale on March 12, 2009 at 6:16

I had forgotten but remembered once we got to talking about Conoco. They did expand the size of their well pads back in December, from 350'x350' to 425'x425'. I even went back on some already built pads. Future HS development could be a factor.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sandstone on March 12, 2009 at 12:31

herefordsnshale, I couldn't post under your question above but here is a link to the map that was posted on KTRE TV's website:

http://www.ktre.com/Global/story.asp?s=9556751

I think there was also one in the Nacogdoches paper.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on March 12, 2009 at 15:37

herefordsnshale, if you want an even more detailed map you can go to the following link:

http://www.transcanada.com/keystone/kxl.html#maps

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm on March 12, 2009 at 16:08

Jim, all I'm telling you is that there are no engineers, geologists, analysts, lab tech's, accountants, managers, LANDMEN, etc. working for Burlington Resources! None. So, you are right in that there are leases under BR but no people working for the so-called company. Now, that again is my main point. Saying that Burlington "OPERATES" ConocoPhillips' unconventional fields is just plain wrong. There is no one working for Burlington so how can they operate??? Check the signatures on any of those permits, leases, assignments, etc. Give me a name and I'll tell you who they work for. And it will be easy...they ALL work for ConocoPhillips, not the company formerly known as Burlington.

And, on all of those permits, check the address. Is it P.O. Box 2197, Houston?? Guess who's address that is? hint...CoP

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm on March 13, 2009 at 2:08

Jim: don't forget, Conoco shareholders got the shaft to go along with their 43.4%! except for the CEO, he got a nice package!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm on March 13, 2009 at 2:07

Jay, as an ex-Conoco guy, I can definetly tell you that Conoco only "bought" Phillips on SEC paperwork. And its mostly Phillips folks that are left. Look at their management committee...only one Conoco guy left. No Burlington guys.

And I'm done with the Burllington/ConocoPhillips argument with Jim. He is living in la-la land thinking there is still a functioning company called Burlington. Yes, the permits are issued in their name but the operation is ConocoPhillips. The mailing address is ConocoPhillips. The people all work for ConocoPhillips. If you can find an office with Burlington's name on it, please let me know where? Go to any drilling rig working on a well permitted to Burlington and ask the drilling foreman who he works for. Bet you $100 he says ConocoPhillips. Done.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm on March 13, 2009 at 2:10

Jim: there are many Conoco gas stations around the country and their are some Union 66 stations as well. Does that mean that there is still a company called Conoco or Union 66? They are a brand, but the gasoline is refined by COP, managed/transported by Cop and the profit goes to COP.

We've argued this mundane issue for far too long. Have a good one!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by herefordsnshale on March 13, 2009 at 9:18

Thanks a lot for the map links Les and Sandstone. I was wondering if any of the land I work on would be affected. It looks like there may be some on the western end.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page