31,000 scientists reject 'global warming' agenda
"More than 31,000 scientists across the U.S. – including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties – have signed a petition rejecting "global warming," the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth's climate."
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate," the petition states. "Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=64734
Cap and Trade and other taxation schemes based upon the farce of Anthropogenic global warming will add hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars of tax burden on American energy consumers. We must reject these schemes and focus on energy independence, not squeezing even more dimes out of the already overburdened members of productive society.
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate," the petition states. "Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=64734
Cap and Trade and other taxation schemes based upon the farce of Anthropogenic global warming will add hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars of tax burden on American energy consumers. We must reject these schemes and focus on energy independence, not squeezing even more dimes out of the already overburdened members of productive society.
Views: 180
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Mac Davis on
-
Some sayings I like:
We have the best politicians money can buy.
He's an honest politician, he stays bought.
or
Our politicians can't be bought. However, they can be rented.
(Yes, I know they aren't self-consistent.)
-
Permalink Reply by Checkmateking on
-
Chavez is already persecuting political enemies with sketchy environmental laws.
One more thing I will add KB, my family's business is one of if not the leading solar power companies in the Arklatex. No one has more to gain from Cap and Trade bullshit than I do.
-
Permalink Reply by Iris on
-
So in a nutshell are you saying we should live like we want to & not doing what we can to protect the environment?
-
Permalink Reply by sesport on
-
Tiger, I think the topic poster is saying, based on the concluding sentence of the post, (and I could be missing the mark here) that he/she is opposed to paying more taxes. That there really is no problem, no GW or climate change or whatever flavor it is today, and we should not have to suffer increased taxes through our utility bills to pay for a non-problem.
So, I guess you're correct in your understanding of the poster's topic ... let's just keep on doing the same old, same old because some don't want to pay for change. We should all be attending one-room schoolhouses (if our parents put the priority on it because we might be needed more on the farm) so we can hopefully attain a 6th or 8th grade education. No need for more taxes & change.
When we always do what we've always done, we'll always get what we've always gotten.
Thanks for that thought & best - sesport :0)
-
Permalink Reply by Checkmateking on
-
"We should all be attending one-room schoolhouses (if our parents put the priority on it because we might be needed more on the farm) so we can hopefully attain a 6th or 8th grade education. No need for more taxes & change."
lol, your crazy
-
Permalink Reply by sesport on
-
CMK - Let's say, just for the sake of argument here, that you have convinced me with your research ... there is no global warming/climate change.
So, to what use do you propose to put the ng produced from the HS?
We can continue to use our own resource of coal to fire power & industrial plants. No reason to switch to ng.
We can continue to wait for electric/electric hybrid vehicles. No reason to make NGVs.
What reason, then, do we have left to drill & produce from the HS?
best & thanks in advance - sesport :0)
-
Permalink Reply by Checkmateking on
-
I think we should be developing natural gas fueled vehicles as quickly as possible. I agree with you wholeheartedly on moving away from oil, especially oil from the middle east.
-
Permalink Reply by sesport on
-
CMK - Okay, that's what we'll do about transportation. This is an area, however, that consumes but a small sliver of the energy fuels.
How do you propose we fire the power & industrial plants? For our electric energy, we can fire plants with coal (which costs more than ng right now), we can go nuclear, we can wait & wait for development of renewables. I've seen petroleum coke mentioned for one plant.
How shall we fire the biggest consumers (the power & industrial plants) of energy?
-
Permalink Reply by sesport on
-
I almost forgot, you said ...
"Cap and Trade and other taxation schemes ...will add hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars of tax burden on American energy consumers."
Okay, you've convinced me (again, for the sake of argument). So, to become energy independent, research & development of renewables are going to come about for free? Also, last I checked, the estimated cost of the Chevy Volt had increased from $30K to $35K and I think I recently saw it estimated to cost $40K. The Tessla is $100K. Going to pay taxes on that (the cost of a vehicle), too.
But I'll agree with you, for the sake of argument, that the citizens should no longer be squeezed. Just keep on doing what we've always been doing.
-
Permalink Reply by Iris on
-
To Checkmateking:
Did you pass the 8th grade? Your spelling seems to indicate otherwise.
-
Permalink Reply by Dorcheated A1 on
-
Tiger Shark,
I can't believe you would knock on the door next to me, and not drop by and say hi.
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
