I did not do either but I recieved a letter from the title company stating that I did not sign over mineral rights (their mistake) and they included some paper work they wanted me to sign. I am thinking I do not want to sign them. Any thoughts?
If the paperwork is a correction deed, whereby you meant to retain the minerals, I'd sign. In a heartbeat.
It's amazing how many landowners 'think' they're retaining their minerals (in Texas) by not 'mentioning' them, when conveying land. I've dealt with a lot of unhappy clients when I told them they 'gave away' their minerals with their land (for less than what the minerals alone could be leased for).
If you'd sold to me, I'd be hesitant to return the minerals. In a lot of cases, the minerals are worth more than the land.
Good luck!
If it is a mineral servitude, 10 years in Louisiana unless there is a good faith effort to establish production (drill a well, even if it is a dry hole) will interrupt prescription on minerals and the prescriptive period begins anew.
If it is a mineral servitude, and there is production, the production interrupts the prescriptive period until production ends. Then the prescriptive period runs anew from the date production ends.
If it is a royalty only servitude, only actual production will interrupt prescription.
Best,
Buddy Cotten
409 members
6 members
253 members
287 members
307 members
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
GoHaynesvilleShale.com is where mineral owners, landowners and oil & gas professionals discuss the Haynesville Shale, Austin Chalk, Terryville Complex, Tuscaloosa Shale, Lower Smackover Brown Dense and lithium plays. Ask questions, share what you know, and keep up with activity in your parish or county. [ Read More ]