Is there anyway to compare these two wells? Or would it be to indepth?
Discussion at our office, which one is producing better,,,,we are not in agreement.
COMPLETED 8-18-11; GAS; HAYNESVILLE RA; 7784 MCFD; 14/64 CHOKE; 158 BWD; 7690# FP; 85# CP; PERFS 12,525-17,034' MD Well # 242358
COMPLETED 1-17-11; GAS; HAYNESVILLE RA; 14,064 MCFD; 22/64 CHOKE; 647 BWD; 7330# FP; 3060# CP; PERFS 12,300-14,951' MD Well #239994
Tags:
Smith,
Based on the IP rate of each well and the percentage of choke, rather than size in inches. And the flowing pressures being so near equal, it was not figured in. Here is what each well would have produced on the other wells choke.
Well #1, Actual IP : 7784 MCFD; 14/64 choke. Estimated IP on 22/64 choke of well #2: ~12,237 MCFD
Well #2, Actual IP: 14,064 MCFD; 22/64 choke. Estimated IP on 14/64 choke of well #1: ~8968 MCFD
409 members
6 members
253 members
287 members
307 members
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
GoHaynesvilleShale.com is where mineral owners, landowners and oil & gas professionals discuss the Haynesville Shale, Austin Chalk, Terryville Complex, Tuscaloosa Shale, Lower Smackover Brown Dense and lithium plays. Ask questions, share what you know, and keep up with activity in your parish or county. [ Read More ]