Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
Oil & Gas Pro "Sesport, the following are comparisons: Traditional Coal Plant - 2614 lb CO2e/MWHr…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 26, 2009 to Two Utilities Are Leaving Clean Coal Initiative (6/26/09)	28	Jun 28, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Sesport, that is the good news - there is no R&D required. This is a proven tech…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 24, 2009 to Moo!	22	Jun 24, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Parker, this may be near EnCana's Deep Bossier Sand prospects in Mississippi. These…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 24, 2009 to HS Eastern boundary? Mississippi?	102	Jul 14, 2009 Reply by Catfish
landowner "Parker, as I had said last Saturday the US rig count increased last week by 23 to 89…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 24, 2009 to Is Rig Count About to Rebound? Scenarios for The Future	13	Jun 29, 2009 Reply by The_Baron
landowner "Sesport, a farm with 10,000 cows could generate ~ 4-5 MW." Les Bamburg replied Jun 24, 2009 to Moo!	22	Jun 24, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Hogeyes, most operators are still in the hold acreage drilling mode so it will be a…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 24, 2009 to Eight wells per section configuration	23	Jun 24, 2009 Reply by Mac Davis
landowner "PG, actually the commercial arrangements include some type of fee payment of profit…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 24, 2009 to Moo!	22	Jun 24, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Mac, I just think it is more efficient to drill in both a north and south direction…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 24, 2009 to Eight wells per section configuration	23	Jun 24, 2009 Reply by Mac Davis
Oil & Gas Pro "Sesport, I know - they must be headed to Melrose Plantation for some mint julips." Les Bamburg replied Jun 24, 2009 to Louisiana Terminal Gets its First LNG Shipment (6/23/09)	9	Jun 24, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "Martin, a typical cargo on the British Diamond would be ~ 58,660 tonnes of LNG which…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 23, 2009 to Louisiana Terminal Gets its First LNG Shipment (6/23/09)	9	Jun 24, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg

‹ Previous
1
…
266
267
268
269
270
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.