Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
Oil & Gas Pro "SB, I do not have a good explanation why Petrohawk is planning 6 wells in Section 28…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 16, 2011 to Petrohawk Submits Alternate Well Applications	18	Sep 16, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "IR, attached are copies of the Petrohawk alternate well applications in T15N-R11W." Les Bamburg replied Sep 16, 2011 to Petrohawk Submits Alternate Well Applications	18	Sep 16, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Kirk, this could be the result of a bad frac job or a geologic feature such as fault…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 16, 2011 to Questions for the Experts	5	Sep 20, 2011 Reply by Gail Brewer
Oil & Gas Pro "Mike, no apologies necessary. Horizontal Haynesville Shale wells only drain ~ 80 to…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 15, 2011 to Petrohawk Submits Alternate Well Applications	18	Sep 16, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "Mike, the alternate wells should have little or no impact on the production of the e…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 15, 2011 to Petrohawk Submits Alternate Well Applications	18	Sep 16, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg
"DBOB, the Pearl Plant produces 140k BPD of GTL products (diesel, aviation fuel, etc)…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2011 to Sasol announces gas-to-liquids complex	6	Sep 14, 2011 Reply by essay
"JW, the Collins well is reasonably good and consistent with other wells in the immed…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2011 to Well sec 21, t12n, r15w	5	Sep 14, 2011 Reply by JW
"JW, results for Section 27. Chesapeake, Collins 27 #H1 Well, Serial #240713, S27-T…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2011 to Well sec 21, t12n, r15w	5	Sep 14, 2011 Reply by JW
Oil & Gas Pro "SB, that was the assumption when they formed these odd shaped units. The State reje…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2011 to Petrohawk Submits Alternate Well Applications	18	Sep 16, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "SB, thanks for the follow-up. They may be experimenting with wider spacing like EnC…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2011 to Petrohawk Submits Alternate Well Applications	18	Sep 16, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg

‹ Previous
1
…
31
32
33
34
35
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.