CLEMENTS HEIRS 17 WELL 001
I would like to know the companies involved in drilling and production of the following well,
NEW HAYNESVILLE SHALE WELL - SECTION 17, T23N R14W – CLEMENTS HEIRS 17 WELL 001
Please comment if you have any information concerning the staus of this well. Last info I have is that FRACING was started as of 8/26.
NEW HAYNESVILLE SHALE WELL - SECTION 17, T23N R14W – CLEMENTS HEIRS 17 WELL 001
Please comment if you have any information concerning the staus of this well. Last info I have is that FRACING was started as of 8/26.
Views: 217
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
John, well permit lists this as a Smackover well. I believe there are also Haynesville Sand units in the North Lake Missionary Field.
-
Permalink Reply by RAZORBACK on
-
Les,
see below,
REPORT DATE WELL STATUS MEASURED DEPTH TRUE VERT DEPTH DETAIL
08/26/2008 09 11080 FRACING
08/19/2008 09 11080 COMPLETION OPERATIONS
08/14/2008 09 11080 MOVING IN WORKOVER RIG - PREPARE TO PERFORATE HAYNESVILLE ZONE
07/29/2008 27 11080 MONITORING PRESSURE
07/10/2008 27 11080 EVALUATING WELL
07/08/2008 09 11080 FRACED, FLOWING BACK
07/01/2008 09 11080 SET TUBING & PACKER. PERFORATED. TESTING
06/04/2008 09 11080 COMPLETION OPERATIONS
05/28/2008 09 11080 WAITING ON COMPLETION
05/25/2008 09 11080 TD 5-21-08. SET 4 1/2" TO 11078 W/1520 SX.
05/20/2008 05 10405 DRILLING
05/13/2008 05 9885 DRILLING
05/06/2008 05 8807 DRILLING
04/29/2008 05 5174 SET 2500 OF 9 5/8" W/908 SX.
04/22/2008 05 SPUD 4-19-08
04/14/2008 01 11500 1595' FNL & 2250' FEL OF SEC 17.
-
Permalink Reply by Checkmateking on
-
The jury is out on this well, most likely its a sand well, not shale. They are being tight lipped about it. Etoco is the operator.
-
Permalink Reply by RAZORBACK on
-
Thanks for the info. I have been contacted by an independant landman who wants to consolidate some acreage in the Wardview area. My first contact with anyone on my acreage. No offer has been made as of today.
-
Permalink Reply by Checkmateking on
-
Well that is some good news.
-
Permalink Reply by RAZORBACK on
-
Thanks for the information. I just read Chesapeaks current news release where they state they will be cutting back spending for the balance of the year as well as into 2009. Worth reading. Try this link if you are interested.
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=104617&p=irol-news&...
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
John, thanks for the info.
-
Permalink Reply by RAZORBACK on
-
ETOCO does look to be a very small outfit. No wonder they are not putting out in info on the well...
-
Permalink Reply by WHuguet on
-
Wrong, Etoco is not affiliated with Chesapeake, nor do I think they are a front for Chesapeake.
They are privately held and I believe well funded and have most of their operations in Texas (not East Texas). From my dealings with them they are a stand up guys.
This was in the works before the Haynesville madness and is mostly a Cotton Valley oil play. Check the lease dates out there.
You guys getting excited, ask yourself why there has been no leasing to the north and west of that well.
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Bennett on
-
Is anyone sure there is no leasing activity to the west or north, or is this purely speculative?
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Natchitoches Parish
399 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
8 members
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Rusk County
97 members
-
Vernon Parish
59 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
242 members
-
Sabine County, Texas
172 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
Angelina County, TX
87 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
