Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 15, 2009 at 2:38

Exxon-Mobil has never been in the Haynesville Shale Play to any significant degree that I am aware of. And informed landowners are aware that the production from the Haynesville, and the other productive formations "behind their pipe", is potentially a forty to sixty year income stream. When you think about it in those terms, the current price of natural gas just isn't that important.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 14, 2009 at 12:04

Parker, yes - it would definitely be interesting to see their outlines, especially EnCana since they have actually drilled and tested. Chesapeake is going to stay fairly quiet as I suspect this is some of the reason for their increased activity in the Southwestern portion of the play.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 14, 2009 at 12:02

Taylor, potentially yes but the details and well contral are fairly sketchy at this time. More operators seem to be interested in the play but the Haynesville Shale will continue to be top priority.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by qwert on September 15, 2009 at 12:26

For what it's worth, Regency Energy also has published a map that depicts both the Haynesville and Bossier shales. It's on page 9 of the attached file. I have no idea how accurate this may be or the source of their information, but it's interesting to follow the few tidbits of information that come out on this formation.

Attachments:

• Bossier.Shale.Map.Regency.Energy.pdf, 5.1 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 15, 2009 at 15:26

Qwert, thanks for the post. The map Regency is utilizing is an older Petrohawk map from about five months ago.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page