Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by harley on January 9, 2010 at 6:01

Could 11 15 in Desoto Parish possibly be a high fault area as to the number of low producing wells such as Sec 19 or 20 or just poor frac jobs. Two miles down the road in Sec 27 that one came in 14.8 mcfd.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on January 9, 2010 at 7:07

I suspect less than optimal frac designs. The Petrohawk well drilling in Section 1 may provide a little insight. In the meantime I suggest that you use SONRIS to conduct a two or three-deep section search around the perimeter of the township to compare proximal IPs.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by H P Bryant on January 10, 2010 at 0:14

Jay, how about sending me a map of the doomed land. I have acreage in 19n.
hoopy18@comcast.net

thanks , h.p. bryant

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on January 10, 2010 at 1:35

Jay,

What do you think about Chesapeake saying that they plan to add 100,000 acre in the Barnett?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by L M Whitten on January 10, 2010 at 3:12

Jay, would you send me a map of the "doomed land" also. I have acreage above 18 n. lmwhitten@aol.com

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by john goodday on January 10, 2010 at 5:36

Jay - Would you please send me a map of the "doomed land" also.

wjb5@cox.net

Thanks for all of your help - Greatly appreciated!!!

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on January 10, 2010 at 4:31

Parker, the targetted 100,000 acres lies within the highly economic Tier 1 part of the play. The acreage is scattered throughout the greater Ft Worth urban are and likely consists of thousands of very small tracts. As you recall, Chesapeake and XTO were the only two companies that would tackle this urban leasing.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by AJB on January 10, 2010 at 5:19

Jay,
Please send map to john@delmarus.com. We have land 18N-11W-20

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RAY on January 10, 2010 at 11:31

Jay,
pls add me to the list..Liamtoh72@hotmail.com......we have land in 18N-15w-24.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Timber Gal on January 10, 2010 at 16:13

Hi - Please send to pookhawk@sbcglobal.net - don't know why the other did not arrive - thanks!
hgh

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KCC on January 14, 2010 at 16:45

Jay, can you email a copy to me @ kcoxmd1@pacbell.net? We have land in Harrison and Panola counties in TX.

Thanks,

kcc

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on January 10, 2010 at 11:36

All the more reason to learn the basics of leasing and how the energy companies operate. Knowledge is power. You've already learned that the location of your mineral tract isn't necessarily a preferred well location just because it's the only dry ground in the vicinity.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• Next ›
• Page