This is the text of his speech. Additional info can be found at the DNR website under the HS section.
http://dnr.louisiana.gov/assets/docs/conservation/documents/EPAWors...
enjoy, 80)
Tags:
Nice presentation,
Looks like it under estimates the number of future Haynesville wells - 4800 sq miles = 4800 sections X 8 wells per section = just shy of say 40,000 wells. Now, I'll by the concept that there will only be 10,000 well sites, but not just 40,000 wells. That doesn't include the areas where the Bossier and Haynesville overlap. Finally, I don't by the of quoted 5 million gallons/well. Actual # IMHO is probably closer to 7.5 to 10 million gallons.
Dbob
Sesport, the following are a few comments/observations.
Slide 2 - Full scale development of the Haynesville Shale began in 2009/2010 rather than Spring 2008.
Slide 5 - The developable area of the Haynesville Shale may cover 5200 sq miles but will require ~ 33,000 wells. The Bossier Shale may need an additional 12,000 wells resulting in a total of 45,000 wells. For Louisiana alone there are 2371 existing units for the Haynesville/Bossier Shale and 2200 wells. Of these wells ~ 1175 are producing.
For comparision, the Barnett is now at 15900+ wells and still going strong - althought much of the current drilling is trying to target oil or fill in existing leases. Generally agreed that we won't see 40,000 wells of the same quality we are seeing now. Over time, as gas prices recover, the more marginal areas will become economic. I'd buy into the idea that you'll see 10,000 wells similar to those currently seen, but will probably see many more over the life of the play, particularly say 20-30 years out from now.
Skip,
The wells have been drilled from roughly 1993 to date. The vast majority were drilled in the last 8 years. There was a big spike in activity with 4000 + drilling permits in 2008, with a drop down to 2000 permits in 2009. It took almost 10 years to drill the first 1000 wells.
I had my number wrong -14900 wells, with 2800 permitted locations. http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/data/fielddata/barnettshale.pdf
I'll have to dig into the permits to see what the ratio of horizontal to vertical is - I suspect there is probably 1 horizontal to every vertical, but that is just a WAG.
I think, but I'm not certain, that the typical IP is lower on a Barnett well vs. a Haynesville. assuming both are horizontal wells. That may account for some of the difference (e.g. more Barnett wells are needed to produce the same gas as one Haynesville)
Recoverable gas looks to be about 50 TCFin the Barnett, vs 250 TCF in the Haynesville (Texas and LA). Assuming production of 8 BCF/well, that would give roughly 31250 wells for full production.
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com