Here's the scenario.  I own property which I purchased already leased to some lease hounds.  I acquired the minerals along with this lease when I purchased the property.  Petrohawk has drilled a well and it has been fracced.  There is no pipeline yet, so no sales.  Lease hounds have neither assigned their interest nor indicated they are going to participate according to Petrohawk.  All notifications from me have been properly made (certified mail) to lease hounds as events have unfolded.  Due to the elapsed time since completion shut in payments are now being made to others in this unit by Petrohawk.  Per my lease I am due 2.50 per acre shut in payment at this time.  1. Should I make demand for this payment from lease hounds?  2. In the future if I must make demand for royalty payments, would my lack of demand for shut in have any effect or could it bolster my case for royalty demand?  Thanks in advance

Views: 491

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Has the primary term of your lease expired?

Yes.

Depending on any lease language addressing the definition of operations you may be in a position to terminate the lease.  I suggest you contact an experienced O&G attorney.  Especially if you have significant acreage.  Petrohawk may even be interested in offering you a top lease in the meantime.

Any suggestions on language for approaching Petrohawk about top lease would be much appreciated?

thanks

Have you reviewed your lease for language addressing the definition of operations?  Petrohawk won't be interested in a top lease if you have a lease that contains a broad definition of operations.  The industry as a whole tends to defend the standard lease language as maintaining the lease if the primary term expires after the well is drilled but before it has been completed.  As The Baron mentions there are a lot of details which are important.  I suggest that you consult an experienced O&G attorney.

I can tell you that they will probally write back and inform you that the well is not shut in but is activly being completed and the lease is held by operations.

 

Hard to say more without more detailed knowledge of the timeline of events, well info and your specific lease language.

 

 

From the time they cut the fence to put in a drive way they are "pursuing operations" and they may not build the driveway for 2 years. Your pretty much stuck with them for years even if they dont do anything, if they do "anything" the years can stretch to decades. A good lawyer and a sack full of money might get you back to just "years" and not decades but it wont be easy. I had the fence cut, a culvert thrown n the ditch and a load of rock dumped on it in about an hour, this happened two days before the lease ran out.

flex, these days the courts do not recognize site work as operations.  But there again we are back to attorneys.  The Haynesville Shale and horizontal wells have rendered out-of-date if not obsolete a number of state regulations and concepts of mineral law.  Although a lot of wells have been fractured stimulated in the past it was nothing remotely close to the number of horizontal wells drilled in the Haynesville Shale Play.  The number of drilled but not fracked wells (Waiting On Completion)  reached into the high hundreds.  As recently as a year ago, Feb. 2011, there were over 600.  There was simply inadequate pressure pumping equipment and crews to keep up with the drilling.  That created a situation where primary lease terms ran out and there was no production.  Operators declined to make shut-in payments and held that leases remained in force through continuing operations although there were no discernible operations to be seen.  In some cases for six or more months.  The backlog of WOC wells is now down to about 50 and that number will be considerably less soon.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service